Outcomes.
Neither actions nor intentions really matter now do they?
2006-12-08 07:09:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actions.
2006-12-08 07:08:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What matters is if the intents could have been met without unethical actions.
2006-12-08 07:08:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actions. I intend to go on a diet and go back to school. I intend to start saving my money instead of blowing it on worthless crap. I intend on learning a new language and an instrument. I truly intend on doing all of them but until I take action, and start doing them..My intentions are basically worthless. You cant show you're truly sincere about your intentions, until they become actions.
2006-12-08 07:11:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dani 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can always have good intentions but it's your actions that really show how true to your word you are.
2006-12-08 07:08:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by to_sassy4_u 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Actions. You can intend to be good, you can intend to be charitable, you can intend to help the little old lady across the street ...
Intentions and $3.95 will get you a cup of coffee.
Actions, actions, actions.
A
2006-12-08 07:09:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The action might desire to be counted the main. besides the shown fact that, for my section the popular public of society might in all probability state that the result concerns the main. reason is in basic terms measurable on a in straightforward terms individual self-reflective point. in straightforward terms the guy with the reason relatively knows what their very own reason is. subsequently, it relatively is achievable that the reason can be counted the main to the guy themself, besides the shown fact that it relatively is illogical for the reason to be counted the main to society because of fact society has no skill for measuring the genuine reason. result can take place with the help of twist of destiny. subsequently, it relatively is unreliable to state that it concerns the main when you consider that is volatile. the result's won from the action, no longer the action is won from the result. If somebody does something volatile which inadvertently produces a constructive result, a advantages isn't handed to the guy who carried out a volatile action. strikes relation to result's causality. If somebody does something constructive in spite of whether it produces a constructive result or no longer, the guy merits advantages. How can a individual carry out a constructive action which does no longer produce a constructive result? If an significant style of different persons carry out in this variety of way that the advantages won from the constructive action are outweighed with the help of the adverse consequences produced with the help of the adverse strikes. subsequently, constructive action does not require constructive result with the intention to be counted the main.
2016-10-14 07:03:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by trinkle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
actions
2006-12-08 07:32:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by thisisawasteoftime 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
actions
2006-12-08 07:08:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Quantrill 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
actions
2006-12-08 07:08:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋