Did you know the 9/11 Attacks were Carried out by the US GOVERNMENT?

Question

Evidence Proves THERMITE cut the Main Pillars:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774&q=thermite&hl=en


A Free Video that proves it was an inside job with evidence, Recommended for Beginners:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=en


Boston to gather for "911 Inside Job"Truth Rally - Boston Tea Party

http://www.boston911truth.org/teaparty/index.html


Evidence I placed in My Profile:

http://www.myspace.com/conspiracyalert


If you dont like Myspace then check out http://www.st911.org or http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html or http://www.ny911truth.org/ or if you like Relgion: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/truth_about_911.htm


Scientists Risk Lives to tell World 911 Inside Job:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403757&in_page_id=1770

Dont Listen to this Moron:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdCg6WLmxOk

Answer 1

911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Answer 2

Well, history and numerous facts support the conspiracy theory. Though one would never come to know for sure. I have gone through the link provided. I mostly agree except the fact that any hydrocarbon fuel, including aviation fuel can have flame temperatures [in ambient air] upto about 1980degC = ~ 3600 deg F, sufficient to melt any and all metals used in aircraft. [ I m a metallurgical Engineer, buddy - specialised in Furnace and combustion equipment]- though achieving that sort of temperatures on the metal itself is EXTREMELY difficult, though NOT IMPOSSIBLE in open environment. To add: Pearl Harbor [W W II] too is considered a SELF ATTACK by many. There were reports- circa 1984-85 of a group of researchers- into just declassified war archives- having stumbled upon records suggesting " Japanese Admiral was paid millions of US$ by US govt Agencies- to attack Pearl Harbor" & that " most ocean worthy & fighting fit ships had been removed already from the harbour prior to the attack, leaving behind mainly dud ships" The researchers- about 10 in number disappeared soon after, their accidental death obituaries hidden in the inside columns. I do not see why and what else could have prompted the Japanese to INVITE USA to war? and not follow this so- called crippling attack by an expeditionary force ? Well, one can only surmise. No proofs per se. Reverse or SELF ATTACKS- students of miitary and political science may throw more light on the significance of these.

Answer 3

Wow, you should have some serious proof of that! You are walking on dangerous ground my friend. The government has people who watch sites like this. If you know to much, then they come for you.

Answer 4

Bull crap - Elvis is still alive too and the mob killed kennedy and we never got to the moon.

Answer 5

Do you really think posting this conspiracy theory in this forum is gonna increase support of your theory? If you do, you should probably post this in Mental Health.

Answer 6

Are you David Icke?

Answer 7

Anyone smart knew that..

Answer 8

.