If you want to prove something you need to find your own facts and evidence. We've fond our evidence and facts stop picking at it until you have found your own.
2006-12-08 05:55:44 · 10 answers · asked by Say no to jesus 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Christians are apparently convinced that there are only two possibilities, and that they are neck-and-neck as far as plausibility and evidence. If they can just find a couple of cracks in the naturalist theory, then people will have no choice but to accept their supernaturalist alternative.
Anyway, they have all the "facts" they need: the Bible says so. It's only because science demands looking at evidence that they even bother - although they clearly don't actually understand the concept yet. But before Darwin, they had no problem believing Creationism simply because there was no alternative, and also because anyone who suggested an alternative was burned at the stake for heresy.
germainerupert: "Everything has to come from someplace" -- where did God come from, again?
2006-12-08 06:00:55 · answer #1 · answered by abram.kelly 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you nonetheless confuse technology and faith. there is no opt to tutor creation. we are the following. We trust that the God who saves us from the penalty of our sins is the God who created us. we've Hs note on the placement. because the Bible hasn't ever been shown to be incorrect about some thing it says, we do not have any reason to doubt. technology, on the different hand, calls for rigorous clinical evidence following the clinical approach. to assert that Evolutionism is technology may be to reject the clinical approach in opt for of philosophy. Disproving evolution does no longer mean that creation became authentic (or faux). it may mean that what we were announcing all alongside is authentic. Evolutionism might want to no longer study in its recent form as technology. it truly is undesirable technology. It grants issues to a theory for which their isn't any perfect clinical evidence. it may tutor that Christians have a more beneficial regard for technology than the "scientists" do. there is no extra evidence for macroevolution than there is for chilly fusion. Microevolution is supported by evidence. subsequently, we can argue that macroevolution should be authentic (with out evidence)." "If we can exhibit that fusion takes position interior the solar, it ought to also be authentic that fusion can take position in chilly situations." both one in each and every of those statements have an identical validity. Scientists of questionable personality have embraced the former and the latter at quite some cases. It became no longer till the scientists ought to no longer reproduce the outcomes that chilly fusion became rejected. effects aren't from now on even hunted for macroevolution. Philosophy has replaced technology. And, everybody who has taken a philosophy route can inform you that you'll argue that a falsehood is authentic and use your assumptions to make it authentic in philosophy. technology is meant to be extra perfect than that.
2016-11-24 23:22:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Christians, Creationists. They'll fabricate their own facts.
2006-12-08 07:41:15 · answer #3 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God-of-the-gaps is the best plan they have currently. Sadly for them, we'll keep filling in the gaps until there's no more room for god.
I mean really, how do you devise an experiment for "God did it"? Even if that was true, what does that explain exactly?
2006-12-08 06:02:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Christians never let facts get in the way of their narrow minded delusion.
2006-12-08 05:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
your so right...did you hear about the guy who was suing the catholic church for proof?..lol...i think its because they dont have their own proof..so what else is there to do but to pick apart the other sides evidence.
2006-12-08 06:04:51 · answer #6 · answered by dotdotdot 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How did man first begin? Did he just spring up from the earth, all of a sudden? Where does Evolution say man came from? Where does Evolution say the world came from? Everything has to come from someplace! That's why we believe in God!
2006-12-08 06:03:10 · answer #7 · answered by Gerry 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
We already have our own evidence. If you want a great read, read "The Evolution Cruncher" by Vance Ferrell. In fact, I plan to teach a class in Creation Science at a community college near you.
2006-12-08 05:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
now you know very well that facts and evidence have no place in religion
2006-12-08 05:58:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
exactly! "I'll reject evolution because there are holes yet to be filled and I will accept the contridiction laden explanation from a bronze age book"
2006-12-08 06:03:29 · answer #10 · answered by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋