Ezekiel talks about the Third Temple. He states, as do the other prophets, that when the Messiah comes and the Third Temple is built, the sacrificial service will be restored.
Now, when Jesus was alive, the sacrificial service was in full swing and it ended shortly after his death when the Romans sacked and razed the Temple. Is this not proof enough that Jesus wasn't the promised Messiah? He was alive at the wrong time and the advent of christianity (viewed as a radical Jewish cult or sect) was one of the proximate causes of the Romans destroying the Temple, hence the opposite outcome.
2006-12-08 05:23:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi, no there is no need to sacrifice anything since Jesus became the eternal sacrifice Himself and no other sacrifice is acceptable to God other than His beloved Son.
2006-12-08 05:10:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The blood of the animal sacrifices foreshadows the blood of Jesus, which obtains “everlasting deliverance for us.” (Heb. 9:12) So, once Jesus died, animal sacrifices had no more significance.
2006-12-08 05:05:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by LineDancer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No and No... The Blood of Jesus became the finest blood to be recieved as a sacrifice.. praise God... by his Blood , In his Blood, no extra want for sacrifices... yet all mercy and style showen......
2016-11-24 23:15:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. The road map out does not include that.
2006-12-08 06:08:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋