Like I can ask a genuine sincere question that sticks within the guidelines of the yahoo guidelines and I'll get an abundance of thumbs down, simply because my view disagrees with their article of faith. Is this justified, or just an immature way to evade confrontation?
2006-12-08 04:12:55 · 4 answers · asked by panda_ninjaza 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Welcome to human nature dear. That's the way narrow minded people are. They condemn anyone who does not agree with them.
2006-12-08 04:15:52 · answer #1 · answered by harmony moon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon on what you said. Did someone take abode a pen from the place of work or became it slightly extra severe than that? homicide may be on the suitable of my record of issues to rfile. very few thoughts that quite opt to be reported: any baby abuse problem, drug use and or possession interior the paintings position, someone wearing a hid weapon and not using a let, stealing some different person's own sources. There are one hundred extra motives to rfile some thing, yet back it quite relies upon on the severity of the alleged crime. you may want to ask your self a question: Will your experience of precise and incorrect be sparkling in case you do not rfile what you said?
2016-11-24 23:10:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not justified but is it an immature way to evade confrontation? No, I don't believe so. Rather it is a defense mechanism in a effort to protect their faith bubble.
2006-12-08 04:16:56 · answer #3 · answered by gjstoryteller 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People get offended by what you write so they want to do something about it, or get back at you by reporting you. I don't think this is an ethical way to do things.
2006-12-08 04:17:06 · answer #4 · answered by Dragonpack 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋