Should we kill 50% of homeless people so we can end poverty?

Answer 1

Yes, because the homeless are secretly ploting to take over the world and the bum killers are realy secret service sects that are stoping them.

Answer 2

They are people too . If you kill 50% it will not stop a thing, If you kill !00% it won't help either there will always be homeless people just a different set of homeless people. Sorry that's not the answer. Did you know they are homeless for different reason? There are many causes so until we eliminate the causes we will have them.

Answer 3

Why not start a work-fare program instead and give them skills and jobs? FDR did this back in the day and we built roads and infrastructure. It ended up making our country (the USA) VERY great.

Killing off our people is a waste. I say put them to work and train them. If they don't want to work, then let them rot. But I know alot of people who would love a chance at a better life and would LOVE something to do other than sit on a street corner.

Trust me, they don't like not being able to shower or survive the elements in nothing but the clothes they can find. Offer them a way out, and make it REAL... and they will most likely take advantage of it. They did back in Roosevelt's presidency.

Answer 4

Are you serious? Why would that thought even come into your head? For one thing that will not end poverty.Why punish the Homeless? Are they not being punished enough by being Homeless.Maybe you should be Thankful you have it better and use your head for better things than wondering if killing human beings will help with poverty!

Answer 5

Why stop there? Why not kill off everyone who makes minimum wage? Why not kill off the lower and middle classes? Why doesn't one person kill everyone else so there will be no poverty altogether?
In case you can't tell, this is sarcasm. Killing homeless people is equivalent to what Hitler did in Germany.

Answer 6

Have you ever been homeless? I have and it was due to uncontrolable circumstances, like tons of the homeless now. What if all the homeless took a poll on "if they killed you, would life get better?"
Have compassion for them and pray that thing would turn around for them all.

Answer 7

No, that is inhumane! I do think that what would help with money, would be to let the inmates on Deathrow do a fight to the death on PPV the last one standing gets to be set free, as long as he is seen as rehabilitated. Our tax dollars would quit going to feed and clothe someone that is going to die anyways, and the money made from the PPV special could all go to help the povertised. That way everyone wins, and the deathrow inmates have a chance at freedom, or a quicker death which is probably better anyways, then waiting around for it to happen.

Answer 8

Sure, living like barbarians is much more preferable than having to look at poor people.

how will killing homeless people end povery? If you want to end poverty, kill the president and the other lawmakers who make it OK for the wealthy to pay little or no taxes but the middle and lower classes are taxed right out of their homes.

Answer 9

No, but there should be an immediate end to the welfare and afdc programs in the US. If those parasitic losers want a check every month then they should get a job, and stop having children that they can't afford to have. That action alone would shore up billions of extra dollars.

Answer 10

The homeless aren't the only poor people.

Many poor live in homes- poverty is defined by comparing assumed costs of living with income.

Answer 11

First of all this will not help ending poverty and secondly how dare you say such a comment like that, there are millions of innocent people who are in poverty.