Yes, there is evidence for intelligent creation, just look around. There is no evidence however for the faery tales that are presented to us in the guise of the bible.
2006-12-08 01:23:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by you do not exist 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes. While there are many evidences of Creation, there is one established "proof" that all true scientists would be forced to accept, and which demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that this earth must have been created instantaneously, and not by a "big bang" which allowed the elements to cool over eons of time.
That proof lies hidden in the radio-halos discovered in rocks like geodes. These radio-halos at one time contained small specks of radioactive material, which, having decayed, leave pockets in the rocks. The problem for those who believe the earth cooled over eons of time, is these halos show clearly that the rock was formed and "cooled" instantly--or else the rapidly-decaying radioactive elements would have left no pocket--they would have been filled in by hot magma. And they have left a "halo" around the pocket, formed by the radiation, which proves the presence of radioactive material.
Nuclear physicist Bob Gentry has done extensive work on these, and is published in well known scientific journals.
2006-12-08 09:34:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by AsiaWired 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Absolutely no scientific journal recognized by academia contains scientific papers on creation. It is regarded simply as a bad joke by the scientific community.
2006-12-08 09:08:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Let me answer your question with a question. Is reproduction not creation? The union of the sperm and the ovum into a zygote, fetus, child and into man is creation. If we trace the story backwards, the sperm and the ovum are composed of H, O, N, C, Ca, K, Fe, Mg, etc.--in other words dust. If we continue to breakdown the atoms into their sub-atomic constitution we can find nothing else but the force called Love--the breath of life. God has given us all the laboratory equipment to create new life--our flesh body, but we continue to reject and deny the evidence. We do not want to do it his way through us. We want to do it our way without him.
2006-12-08 09:26:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by PabloSolutin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and it's not even really a theory. It is vaguely defined and there is no evidence you can put towards it to show it true or false. There is no evidence that anybody can think of that, if found, would show it false. And there is no objective evidence that could support it, because it is undefined.
2006-12-08 09:03:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes look deep into yourself and you will find that you are real evidence for creation.
2006-12-08 09:01:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Evidence....thank you.
Yes there is some evidence to creation. The fossil record...lack of soil layers in between the sediments...clastic dykes in the fossil record...Lunar orbit....the ammount of comets still in the solar system, I believe even saturns rings point to a younger earth. The whole Intelligent design argument. It's an interesting study.
Diveristy of species, irreducible complexity..certain symbiotic relationships in wildlife.
2006-12-08 09:03:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
REAL scientific evidence?
More than REAL scientific evidence for evolution.
2006-12-08 09:03:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by kent chatham 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
no. ID would have you think so but their "evidence" is nothing except arguments against evolution.
2006-12-08 09:02:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
tons
2006-12-08 09:04:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jayne R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋