It also states the victim died almost immediately at the scene. The man died in the street with a stranger holding his hand. The person ran a stop sign (don't know the speed), hit a Ford F250 truck which spun around into a caddy where the victim was killed. Had to be high speed to have had such an impact. Agree??? This happened in Florida.
2006-12-08 00:09:01 · 10 answers · asked by ambay 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I was told the 2 charges on the unlawful death were because one of them will be dropped. The D.A. wants to charge the offender with everything they can. Oh, the wife of the victim just lost her son a year before from a car accident!
2006-12-08 00:28:51 · update #1
Not nearly enough. I bet this person has had several DUIs.
2006-12-08 00:18:14 · answer #1 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Vehicular Homicide and Manslaughter? How is that possible. I could see one charge for an unlawful death, but two for the same crime?
I'd say 20 years and out in 10 for the unlawful death and then more for the drug possession added on.
It isn't enough though.
PS... Thank you Ambay for clarifying that for me. That makes sense.
2006-12-08 00:21:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lucky for the victim's family Florida has the death penalty... Depending on what the driver's record is, I would hope it'd be that or if he has no record I'd hope he'd get 20 years + (even though it will probably only be that with probation and rehab)
2006-12-08 00:18:31 · answer #3 · answered by IceyFlame 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As much as we villify driving under the influence these days, I still think that after all is said and done were talking about Man 1 with a medium sentence. A shame but that's the way these things usually work out.
2006-12-08 00:19:41 · answer #4 · answered by Ricky J. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Prob about 8 years depending on his lawyer and then another 2 to 3 years probation. It depends a lot on his criminal history as well.
2006-12-08 00:17:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Inevitable? probably. In my 6 years in regulation enforcement, I even have considered one individual who became into given criminal probation for this appropriate element, yet like maximum probationers have been given revoked and ended up interior the Pen because of the fact she could no longer stay off the sauce.
2016-10-05 01:12:58 · answer #6 · answered by grumney 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What I think he should get is life in prison. What he'll get is probably a couple years in a minimum security facility and the probation. Actually I think he should be hanged. We need the punishment they had 100 years ago. The current U.S. justice system sucks.
2006-12-08 00:13:15 · answer #7 · answered by korines 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think that the defendant will get the max that there is for pain and suffering that he has caused to the victims families.
2006-12-08 01:49:07 · answer #8 · answered by wenwen 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He should be made to apologise to the family of the victim, and do years and years of supervised work. He could be left in jail to rot, but what's the point of that?
2006-12-08 00:29:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably life. Or close to it. He should have the book thrown at him.
2006-12-08 03:52:46 · answer #10 · answered by smeezleme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋