He seems adverse to listening to what the majority have to say on Iraq, does anybody really believe he will Uturn on Iraq or stick to his guns, and bombs, and soldiers etc... I think he wants it his way or no way.
2006-12-07 20:49:40 · 11 answers · asked by Dumbledore 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Neither. He's a politician - he'll fudge.
He'll do his own thing and claim to have implemented the ISG report (even where he's done the opposite).
2006-12-07 20:52:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think like everyone he will critique the report and take some suggestions while leaving others. It needs to be understood that large sections of this report are crap. The whole idea that we should negotiate with Syria and Iran is preposterous and unworkable. These 2 nations are the largest sponsors of terror on the planet and they are not going to act unless it is in their own best interests. This translates to bad for America's interests. We do need new directions in Iraq and I hope that we get them, but backdoor surrender such as the ISG is suggesting in not the answer. Their solutions are for the most part unrealistic and unworkable, but they certainly play well on the evening news with antiwar crowd.
2006-12-07 20:58:31 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is too early to comment on this report. There are some things the report said that simply do not make sense (such as involving Syria and Iran - countries that are supporting and financing the violence for their own ends).
IMO - the report will be reviewed and those parts that make sense will be implemented and those that do not will be discarded.
2006-12-08 02:02:18 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yet that isn't the reality, that's purely greater opinion. that is not proper who ok'd that checklist, in element of actuality that there became into little or little question expressed by using the CIA approximately those on the time. seem on the Congressional data. human beings, you could attain that what that's is a clean attempt to re-write historic previous. that is 1984 Ministry of fact stuff.
2016-10-17 23:35:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that bush will most likely to ignore the report cuz of one thing.........he's war mongering and the fact that he was waiting for this kind of opportunity to pop up and he got lonely playing by himself in his "little war game" so he got Tony Blair to join in but I think that a new leader is needed at some point but for now lets see how long he can last, lets see if he can finish what he has started.
2006-12-07 22:44:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We need a leader like Jefferson Davis again
2006-12-07 20:59:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the study and recommendations are a waste of time and money, Bush will do whatever he wants.
2006-12-08 00:31:11 · answer #7 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's gonna do what is good for America cause that's the kind of leader he is.
2006-12-07 20:58:53 · answer #8 · answered by josh m 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You answered it! He does what he wants and up to this point a gutless congress has never challenged him. God help our Nation!
2006-12-07 20:58:51 · answer #9 · answered by aigman1999 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We already know the answer, G.W. will ignore it just like he as in the pass...
2006-12-07 21:16:17 · answer #10 · answered by SSDD 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋