They say they are the homes of God, Allah, Jehovah, etc and that they work on behalf of this (alleged) individual and speak in his name - so why not take responsibility for his "actions"???
2006-12-07 20:00:42 · 10 answers · asked by Forlorn Hope 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The expression "acts of god" is anti-god slander. Sadly, Christendom itself is to blame for much of the anger some feel toward the Almighty.
This article is especially interesting:
http://watchtower.org/e/pr/article_04.htm
Jehovah God actually has promised to resolve all human suffering, including that caused by the weather and so-called "natural disasters".
Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/20030808/
http://watchtower.org/e/20050722/
http://watchtower.org/e/kn37/
2006-12-08 04:15:11 · answer #1 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Interesting thought but just as I could not sue your children for something someone claims is your fault you could not sue me for being a Jehovah's Witness for what some insurance companies call an act of God.
In response to the person who said "They(religious practitioners) sure are making money off of it". We Jehovah's Witnesses are not paid to Witness. Everything is donation based. So if you were going to try to sue our organization or those of us who choose to serve Jehovah there would not be allot of money to be made.
2006-12-10 12:02:32 · answer #2 · answered by Ish Var Lan Salinger 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"because the conception of the great bang theory is finished crap to everybody with the iq of a 6 12 months previous. " Uh huh. Yeah, it extremely is why it truly is globally commonly used between each and each and every of the suitable physicists. I doubt you need to even note the conception in the back of vast bang with out resorting to nonsense like "stuff exploded" and so on.
2016-11-24 22:36:31 · answer #3 · answered by mccay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK. So how are you going to make God pay? Satan has been trying to get God for thousands of years and hasn't had any success yet.
I Cr 13;8a
12-8-6
2006-12-07 20:03:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm for it. But keep in mind that In each case, you would have to prove that the "Act" of a perfect being was wrong. Could you do that?
2006-12-07 20:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by reasonmusic 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO but you can sue them for impersonating religions acting in his name! but without proof you could not win.
2006-12-07 20:05:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They definitely make money of it. Hugh? I've read and heard you can , You need to talk to an attorney call PrePaid Legal 1-800-654-7757: you can sign up for unlimited consultation with an attorney for $16-$25. I have it and use it extensively .its called "Tort" law.
2006-12-07 20:11:20 · answer #7 · answered by knowlegeSeeker 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The religions will tell you that you have to sue God.
2006-12-07 20:03:29 · answer #8 · answered by The professor 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
in this day and age of ridiculous, frivolous lawsuits, I keep waiting for that one to make the news
2006-12-07 20:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be interesting to see, maybe that would get them to finally shut up and leave other people alone.
2006-12-07 20:03:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋