Can you prove that there is no God?

Answer 1

You cannot prove that there is no God.

How can something be created out of nothing into something so intricate and unique if there is no divine power?
How can each and every person have a different DNA and be so different from the person next to them without an amazing creator?
How can everything on Earth be so planned and complete in its formation without something larger taking control?
How do animals look after their young instinctively?
Ants know when it's going to rain?
Squirrels know to collect nuts for the winter?
There has to be I God.
I know there is a God.

I believe that you asked the wrong question. It's easy to see that there is a God. How can you prove there isn't one?

Answer 2

JP above is trying to say that if we can prove that Schrodinger's Cat is alive or dead without looking, then God doesn't exist. Of course, one could say that any manmade construction such as logic would fall under the rubric of that assumed determinism or stochasticism and thus be a dependent variable. The hidden variable, perhaps the elusive God, is yet to be found! No manmade system of thought can escape the condition of Man. Thus, we can't prove it!

Answer 3

This question gets asked several times a day. The answer is No but I am not the one proposing a God. There are no reasons to believe there is a God and it is your burden to prove that there is a God. If you were in a Court charged with murder would you like the Judge to say guilty unless you can prove that the victim was not murdered by you. Would that seem right. I think you would take the view that sane courts do and expect the prosecutor to prove that you are guilty. I don't think you would accept the prosecutor's case being, "I believe she is guilty, so lets hang her!" as a valid proof either.

Answer 4

Have physicists found the God?
Yes. They have.
How?
=========
1.
What is the first law of Universe ?
It is :T=0K.
2.
What is the second law of Universe ?
To answer of this question we must ask:
" What geometrical and physical parameters
have the particles in Vacuum T=0K? "
The Quantum physics approves, that in the beginning
Vacuum created a " virtual particle ", Quantum of Light.
3.
What is the “virtual particle ", Quantum of Light?
===================
On the question:
What must be present in a body to make it alive ?
What inhale the Life in formulas and equations ?
The answer is:
Soul. Quantum of Light.
====================
The secret of God and Existence hide
in the “Theory of light quanta”.
Because, from all particles, only and only
the quantum of light is a privileged particle.
========================
http://www.socratus.com
============================

Answer 5

NO but i can prove that the bible or the koran are inaccurate and idiotic. There for not the word of God.

Answer 6

Now Bella,why do you ask such a loaded question?
Sounds like someone is a little insecure in their beliefs.
I've heard it best summed up like this:
Some people believe in God,
Some people do not,
Untill God comes down out of the sky and resolves the question,
ITS JUST BELIEF.
I've never been able to argue with point.

Answer 7

A lack of evidence against something is not a good argument for it. For instance, people always tell me, show me some evidence to believe in the loch ness monster, but I say, show me some NON-evidence. There are much better arguments for believing in God other than that people cannot disprove him, understand? I fully believe in God, but it has to do with evidence I have seen, not just a belief that has yet to be refuted.

Answer 8

No, you cant prove that there is no God,
It's as same as you also cant prove that there is brain inside your head, coz you can;t see your brain, you cant touch your brain, you can't smell ur brain, and can't hear your brain.

And if you cant prove there is brain inside your head, then why i must listen to your conclusion then :P

Answer 9

Yes.

For knowledge to exist, three facts must be accepted as true:

- Math & Logic are valid
- Direct observations or aided observations supported by Math & Logic are valid
- Supernatural existence, if real, does not involve itself in the natural realm (otherwise, any 'fact' could be changed by the interference -- say by the God of Gravity changing his mind on how strong it will be tomorrow).

Free will can thus be shown to be false:

- The mind is a consequence of the physical nature of the brain (Nonsupernatural causation axiom).
- Quantum physics contains a truly random component (Mathematical axiom)
- All observations can be expressed mathematically (Mathematical axiom).
- All principles causal to observations can be expressed mathematically (Mathematical Axiom).
- All mathematical expressions can be evaluated (Mathematical Axiom).
- An evaluation need not be deterministic, it can be stochaistic, that is, describing 'probabilities'. (Statistical mathematics).
- Since quantum physics can affect the human brain, and thus mind, the human state is mathematically stochaistic (consequential)
- If the quantum randomness is rescoped to be viewed as an input, the human brain ceases to be stoichasitic and is deterministic. (statement of rescope)
- A deterministically computable system is incapable of escaping its previous states, and produces outputs based on a computable result of the previous state and current inputs.(Turing-Church Thesis)
- Determinism counters free will. (By definition)
- Free will is not possible. (consequential)
- If a deity exists, free will is a natural consequence. (axiomic, potentially debatable. However, a deity that creates intelligence without free will cannot hold its creation responsible)
- Free will does not exist, therefore, deity does not exist. (modus tollens).

The idea of a god existing is disproven logically.

----

BigPappa: You are of course free to reject the axioms. However, in doing so, as described, you reject the ability to have knowledge at all, because all three of those axioms are defensibly necessary for knowledge.

It's like geometry -- In Euclidean geometry, there is an axiom that states, "Given a line and a point not on that line, there is one unique line through that point such that it is parallel to the given line." If for some reason you don't like this axiom, you are free to dispose of it and keep all the others. You simply no longer are playing the 'Euclidean geometry' game, you're playing the 'hyperbolic geometry' game, because all of Euclid's axioms BUT the parallel line axiom hold true also for hyperbolic geometry.

Answer 10

J.P. I cannot agree with your assumption:

Supernatural existence, if real, does not involve itself in the natural realm (otherwise, any 'fact' could be changed by the interference -- say by the God of Gravity changing his mind on how strong it will be tomorrow).