Are the birth stories of Jesus in Matthew and Luke are not identical.?

Answer 1

Not identical but the meaning are the same.

Answer 2

If there is discrepency, it could be from the different syles of writing. Luke was a physician, and one of paul's followers (i think it was paul), and he reported on a lot of the miracles, he was writing to some one as well. Telling the story to one of his friends.

Matthew was one of the disciples, and was able to witness everything first hand. A lot of people believe the reason he wrote his Gospel was to make disciples. His book focuses more on the Jews as well. In the book of Matthew, more Jewish customs show up than in any other book.

I hope this helps explain the differences. <><

Answer 3

They don't contradict each other they were just written by two different people who had two different ideas of what they wanted to relate to their readers. Matthew's gospel was written to Jewish people and part of his intent was to portray Jesus as the promised Messiah King of the Jews. The gospel of Luke was written by a Greek physician named Luke to his friend named Theophilus and Luke was more interested in portraying Jesus' outward humanity and inward divinity. Matthew gives the ancestry of Jesus through his adoptive father Joseph all the way to Abraham to show that Jesus had the legal claim to the throne of David. Luke gave the ancestry of Jesus through Mary and traced it all of the way back to Adam as a thorough historian/doctor might do for his intellectual Greek readers.

Matthew 1:1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

Luke 1:1-4 Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, (2) just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word have delivered them to us, (3) it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (4) that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught.

Colossians 4:14 Luke the beloved physician greets you, as does Demas.

Answer 4

confident, he might desire to be a male the image of his mom. apparently the female X chromosome, whilst between the little legs is broken turns into the male Y chromosome. it form of feels femaleness is a few extra effective DNA on the intercourse chromosome. men and females human beings proportion this Y genetic fabric. If Mary had an X chromosome wreck off and an ovum formed with an X and Y chromosome (i know they're meant to divide, yet in line with probability it did no longer) and that cellular underwent parthenogenesis (an somewhat uncommon element of determine) then a virgin delivery of a male baby is hypothetically achievable.

Answer 5

One follows the lineage of Joseph, the other of Mary.
They both were related to David, through different lines.
Some might consider Joseph's lineage to be unimportant, but I believe that it is somewhat important since he was the father image in Jesus' upbringing.

Answer 6

Nope, the chronologies do not line up. One has a straight, biographical He-was-born-in-such-a-place account, and the other starts right away with his teachings.
If you think that's weird, try the Gospel of John. It's really weird by comparison.

Answer 7

No two books and writers are the same, each person sees things in different ways

Answer 8

It is the same story from different perspectives.

Answer 9

When two people make up their own stories, they are bound to be different---------fiction is that way.

Answer 10

Are you asking if they are ? read them and find out