Is it better to exercise longer at a steady rate or quick and high impact?
2006-12-07 13:04:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
Longer at a steady rate, if you want to get in shape.
2006-12-07 13:11:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think longer at a steady rate. Quick and high impact could cause serious damage by over exertion. Be patient.
2006-12-07 21:12:42 · answer #2 · answered by Mustang Sally 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For overall health, exercise longer at a steady rate.
2006-12-07 21:06:37 · answer #3 · answered by Joya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
longer and at a steady pace so your body can get used to the exercise you are doing.
2006-12-07 21:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally like to push my workouts to the limit, so my answer is not just quick at high impact but long at high impact lol..not to the extent of "high impact" but usually what i consider high impact is just pushing yourself above n' beyond your limits. Usually the feelings of soreness tell you FOR SURE that you know your workout has accomplished something..im feeling sore from dumbbells..but it feels great to know that i did something effective lol...As long as you dont turn to steriods and do it naturally...im down with it man lol.
2006-12-07 21:16:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well it depends on what you want but, id say high impact..sprint 40 yard dashes, sprint uphills, plyometircs. thats what i think.
2006-12-07 21:08:42 · answer #6 · answered by matthew s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋