No, it does not sound yucky to me, but I reject creationism because it sounds 'dumb'. Well, not maybe not dumb when it was first thought of, as it was simply primitive, like the people who told the story the best way they knew how at the time. Man today knows better, because science has disclosed knowledge that primitive man did not and could not know. For modern humans to adhere to ancient primitive stories as the truth when evolutionary science has made the definite case against creationism can only be callled dumb. Only religious persons intent on finding a way to prove the Bible as God's divine word give it any credibilty. Their so-called scientific attempts to disprove evolution fall miserably short of real science.
2006-12-07 13:22:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hahahahaha!!!! Maybe some do.
Personally I find the idea that I came from dirt to be pretty yucky. Also, women being spawned from the rib of a man? That's yucky as well.
EDIT: OH MY GODDESS, some of these answers are genuinely frightening!
2006-12-07 21:03:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No.
The introduction to Genesis and to the whole Bible ascribes everything to the living God, creating, making, acting, moving, and speaking. There is no room for evolution without a flat denial of Divine revelation. One must be true the other false. All of God’s works are good, great, wondrous, and perfect.
Man starts from nothing. He begins in helplessness, ignorance, and inexperience. All his works, therefore, proceed on the principle of evolution. This principle is only seen in human affairs: from the hut to the palace; from the canoe to the ocean liner; from the spade to the plowshare to machines. But the birds build their nests today as at the beginning. There is growth and development within man, but no passing, change, or evolution out from one into another.
For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be evident stages of evolution today. You would be able to find species in many stages of evolution in nature right now. For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be no God. And that’s exactly what evolutionists believe and are trying prove. The evolutionist bases his or her conclusions on human assumptions and reasoning, instead of on the documentary evidence of the manuscripts.
2006-12-07 21:03:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No because i don't want to be related to monkeys even if I am. Oh, just a common ancestor? I wonder where I got that tad bit of misinformation then.... OK, I'm cool with that.
2006-12-07 21:12:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
It's just not logical.
And Darwin began his fairy tale saying,
"Once upon a time there was a dirty puddle of water. Then some lightning struck the water. And magically a cell formed! Then from that cell came an amoeba that would grow into a fish, then a monkey, then a man!"
"Wow Mr. Darwin, that's so amazing!" said one listener.
"Wow Mr. Darwin, you're full of BS," said another, who actually believed in the truth --- God made us not we ourselves.
2006-12-07 21:04:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by . 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I reject evolution because God says we are from Adam and Eve. I believe Him. If I didn't believe in God I would probably think otherwise.
2006-12-07 21:06:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by catscratch 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I reject evolution as it has utterly failed to accurately explain where male and female came from.
2006-12-07 21:03:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
If you feel your grandfather was a Gorilla thats your business.
2006-12-07 21:04:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by robert m 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
No, because it has no real support/foundation. What keeps it going, the monkeys?
2006-12-07 21:11:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by charmaine f 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
yeah, evolution definatly happend
2006-12-07 21:05:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋