Controlling the world's population should be our #1 priority. Most of the problems in the world can be attributed to overpopulation.
And no, this doesn't involve killing people, simply encouraging more families to have fewer children.
2006-12-07 11:23:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by boukenger 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Singapore’s inhabitants has extra effective each three hundred and sixty 5 days to almost 25% over the final ten years - it fairly is now near to 5 million people. The inhabitants density of Singapore is now 18,350 people according to sq. mile making it the 0.33 maximum densely populated usa interior the international. in assessment, the U. S. has a inhabitants density of 80 3 people according to sq. mile. If the U. S. had an identical inhabitants density as Singapore, the inhabitants may well be around sixty 8 billion people. that's extra effective than ten cases the inhabitants of the international. i'm particular i'm not by myself as quickly as I say the branch shops, parks, highways, parking areas, MRT, buses, and eating places are already way overcrowded on the weekend. Will including extra people advance the favored of existence? i basically can not think of what existence in Singapore would be like while the inhabitants is pushed yet another 20% from 4.987M to 6.0M. the subsequent time you're waiting in an prolonged queue, or filled into the MRT, think of roughly status there with an further 20% extra people. it is going to help bypass the time
2016-12-11 04:28:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, we are not at the brink of war, we are in it. Socially, religiously, literally. Birth control devices and sex education are wonderful tools but like any tool it has to be implemented to work properly. We cannot even control birth rate in our own country. How in the name of God do you expect us to be taken seriously with respect to this issue elsewhere? Our best stab at birth control seems to be abortion or simple murder once the child is born. Oh yeah and don't forget our millions of hungry and oppressed right here. People will go over seas and adopt children to bring here but our orphanages are full to the point where social services cannot adequately provide good homes for them in society. Take care of our own yard first, then go to the neighbors.
2006-12-07 11:27:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
so true - thats exactly what the church has achieved in Africa and parts of Asia because of it outdated doctrines, as much as I hate the control the US has on world events etc. I feel this certainly would have been a benefical action but not much hope of that happening with a bunch of evangelical fanatics running the US now , Its ironicc that by taking a pro-life standpoint the church has caused so much human suffering I wonder If we can try them for war crimes I mean when you really think it over it is the largest genocide in world history
2006-12-07 11:27:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by harro_06 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
depending on the location over population is not such a big problem.
granted in some African nations they have a birth rate they do not need but in developed countries were the resources and the ability to have more kids exists our birth rate is low.
we have enough resources to sustain a population 10X the amount we have. We are just not able to distribute them efficiently.
2006-12-07 11:25:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes it is ALWAYS AMERICA'S problem to deal with what others do. I'm all about helping but sometimes you just have to leave others alone. If another country is poppin' babies like no tomorrow then you better hope their OWN government is going to do something or talk to them about it. Your expecting to much and blaming all the world's problems on America when people do their own things and cause their own problems. In America and elsewhere.
2006-12-07 11:25:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cindy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Starting with? Look, the USA has done far more world policing than it should. Who are we to tell others they cant have babies or should use condoms/birth control pills. It's none of our business. Would you like it if the world peeked in your bedroom?
2006-12-07 11:28:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, the world would be better off, especially if the birth rate control affected you.
2006-12-07 11:25:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Larry,
The poster child for birth control.
Sounds like it could be catchy.
Get A Grip
2006-12-07 11:28:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Get A Grip 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm kind of tired of being the policemen for the world.
2006-12-07 11:25:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by padwinlearner 5
·
1⤊
0⤋