English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

They are both great, and like the previous user said, it is hard to compare them. They participate in entirely different sports.

2006-12-07 07:37:37 · answer #1 · answered by kelikristina 4 · 0 1

Without a doubt, Tiger is an international superstar who has been trained to handle the media and the fans . Jordan is surly, unfriendly, besides Jordan career would have been far different had Magic and Bird's career not ended prematurely he would have been on the line of a Dominique Wilkins - artistic dunks and nothing more. Tiger has completely dominated his sports best, Jordan cannot make that claim.

2006-12-07 10:53:36 · answer #2 · answered by tesorotx 5 · 0 0

Tiger for sure! Jordan didn't dominate right away in the NBA but Tiger made an impact almost from the start. What Tiger has accomplished so far would make anybody elses careers and he is still in his prime. He will dominate for years to come and then this question will never be asked again.

2006-12-07 16:22:59 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 2 · 0 0

Tuff question cause the sports are so different. Jordan had teammates to help and Tiger is all alone out there.

I guess if you look at an NBA championship as a Major tournament in golf then Tiger is / was better cause he won more than Jordan.

I think we should all just be happy we get / got to watch them perform during our lifetime.

2006-12-07 07:55:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WOW! A tough and excellent question! Michael is done, so we can take a really good look at his entire career. Tiger, I think, is far from done. Many people believe that golfers hit their prime in their 30s. Tiger's best may be yet to come!!!! (as hard as that is to imagine!!!). I would have to wait until Tiger is done, which could be 20-30 years from now, although I doubt it. Even then, I think it's going to be a tough call. 2 AWESOME Athletes! Great question!

2006-12-07 08:17:22 · answer #5 · answered by Steve 3 · 0 0

we could seem at it by employing awards & titles: Jordan; 6 Titles 6 Finals' MVP's 5 customary Season MVP's Woods; 14 Majors Victories sixty 8 PGA excursion Wins 15 worldwide golfing Championship Wins 36 eu excursion Wins certainly, i'm a basketball fan and that i could desire to provide the nod to Jordan. My reason of giving him the nod is in simple terms because of this. Jordan's been to the Finals precisely 6 situations and gained precisely 6 situations. additionally, as quickly as he have been given to the Finals (with the Bulls) he on no account lost and consistently went lower back. He had a three-peat from ninety one-ninety 3 then retired for ninety 4&ninety 5. He then made a comeback and had yet another 3-peat from ninety six-ninety 8 and retired on precise. Woods has been wonderful two times from a considerable journey. in simple terms in line with that, i could could desire to provide Jordan the nod. the two are exceptional athletes and tops between their activities respectively.

2016-12-18 09:24:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It is impossible to compare unless you own a time machine and can go into the future to see the rest of Tiger's career. Tiger is only 30 years old and may have his best or worst years ahead of him...

2006-12-08 06:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not taking anything away from Michael Jordan... but Michael Jordan won all his championships with a team around him... one of the best teams ever assembeled...Tigers done it by himself over and over and over again.

2006-12-07 08:30:46 · answer #8 · answered by reggaegotsoul1 1 · 0 0

Different sports, bad question, bad.

I'm telling Patrick Star and Mister Krabs on you.

2006-12-07 07:35:42 · answer #9 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 0 1

Yes.

2006-12-07 08:54:36 · answer #10 · answered by SG 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers