DUH....So we can make babies out of it.
2006-12-07 06:59:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I guess I'm silly then. I don't mind, I've been called worse. The bible never said man was created from ALL the dirt. Just from the dirt. Like I can make a sweater from wool, but it doesn't mean I am using all the wool of all the sheep all over.
2006-12-07 15:01:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Only the first two human was made from the dust of the ground everyone else was born. That leaves plenty of dirt. We are made out of the elements that are in the ground. - I am not a creationist - but that is simple logic.
2006-12-07 17:27:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by linniepooh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right. It is irrational to think life came from dirt.
2006-12-07 15:35:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we came from an organic soup,why isn't it still happening?If evolution is true,why does a fish die when it's left out of water?If all the elements have to be there all at the same time for life to occur,why does the female egg have to have fertilization by the male sperm first in order to produce an embryo?Why is it,when scientist fail in an experiment,they have to dream up an excuse?Is it possibly one of those "if I can reproduce this in a laboratory,that will prove God doesn't exist"?You're only trying to figure out what God has already perfected.
2006-12-07 15:46:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Derek B 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, if man was evolved from apes then why are there still apes and why are apes no longer evolving? Further, there still hasn't been a discovery of a single transitional phase fossil which definitively links man to any other species.
For an idea to be genuine science it must be produced or replicated within the observation of nature or through replication via experimentation. Macro-evolution cannot be observed in nature nor can it be duplicated through scientific experimentation. As a result macro-evolution remains a psuedo-science and not a "legitimate science."
Macro-evolution is a "religion of faith." The same as any other unobservable and unproven ideals about the origins of the Universe.
2006-12-07 15:12:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sholom 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
First off, I'm definitely not a creationist, but your question is illogical. Reread it and see if you can find any relative connection between human beings and left over dirt. Look at it this way: a painter creates a beautiful picture on canvas and when he's done, he still has paint left. Get the point?
2006-12-07 15:05:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sick Puppy 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
You go girl! Irrational people are silly, but ignorant people are scary.
2006-12-07 15:00:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Medusa 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because we didn't EVOLVE from the dirt, SILLY! We were formed from it.
2006-12-07 15:03:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by lookn2cjc 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
they trying all their life ton clean up the dirt and they die with rhe dirt
2006-12-07 14:59:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by george p 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
are body's are biodegradable,,,and go back to the dirt.
2006-12-07 15:00:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by zee zee 6
·
1⤊
1⤋