2006-12-07 05:41:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well, He was stripped of his garments before he was nailed to the cross.
It's possible he could have been naked.
I'm not sure that kind of imagry would have sold real well, though.
2006-12-07 05:45:39 · answer #1 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was naked on the cross. It was mean to humiliate him. However, artist were trying to be tasteful when they painted him in a loin cloth.
2006-12-07 05:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by philyra2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From what I've heard, people who were crucified were often stripped naked.
The Bible says this:
John 19:23-24
23 When the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining. This garment was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom.
24 "Let's not tear it," they said to one another. "Let's decide by lot who will get it."
This happened that the scripture might be fulfilled which said,
"They divided my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing."
(from New International Version)
2006-12-07 06:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probable not, yet that is unknown. aside from the reality that Romans while they crucified the accused, they nailed them bare to the pass, to lead them to sense extra ashamed, and hatred.
2016-12-13 04:37:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artist interpretations only. How come they all look similar? don't they have any originality?
2006-12-07 05:47:35 · answer #5 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're assuming that jesus even existed....
and here comes the hate mail....
2006-12-07 05:46:29 · answer #6 · answered by JerseyRick 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he was naked like all who were crucified
2006-12-07 05:45:11 · answer #7 · answered by superstes88 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋