Will the Iraq Study Group Report, change the situation in Iraq.?

Question

The Iraq study Group Report has stated that after 2,900 US Military deaths.

21,000 US Military injuries

some 60,000 enemy combatants killed or captured.

And over 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, the US is "not winnning the war in Iraq".

Do you believe that the President will finally man up for once and take this report seriously, and do you think it will make a difference in the Iraq war.

(sources: NBC News excerpt of the "Iraq Study Group Report")

Answer 1

No, not until he gets a serious report. This war isn't about PC paragraphs, it's about killing shittbirds following fantatatics who want to get back to the west and kill some more.

Chew on that for awhile you shallow miscreant.

Answer 2

I believe the study group's findings has too many falsehoods in the finding's key points to a reliable tool.

The first falsehood is that we are losing the war. To lose the war, the U.S. would have to lose all the goals it set out to do. Those goals were to create a Democratically elected government (accomplished), to build 3,200 infrastructure projects (82% completed as of August 2006) and train enough police and Soldiers so Iraq's government can protect itself (The Iraqi president says that will be accomplished in June 2007). So where is the losing point? There was no objective to actually stop the fighting. The U.S. is just standing in until the Iraqis are trained.

Another problem is to get Syria and Iran involved. Yes, because that is working oh so well in Lebanon, Chechnia, the former Yugoslavia, Sudan, Ethiopia, Bali, Indonesia, India, Burma and the Philippines. Syria and Iran are training and supplying groups that favor fighting over politics. This leads to a second poor point. The study group links all the problems to the Palistine/Israeli conflict. Syria and Iran have a goal to have a Muslim world even if it requires force. It goes way beyond Israel, because eliminating Israel will not stop the fighting elsewhere.

Answer 3

They(the bush administration) implemented like 90% of there suggestions. When that did nothing to help the problem the loud anti-president people stopped talking about it. Because if they talked about it they would have to admit that the panel was wrong not just the president, and there entire goal is to use the pres as a scape goat. Most the people who are saying the loudest we should not have gone to war are the same ones who voted for the bill that sent us to war. A good example is Hillary Clinton she said the other day that she was opposed to war back in 2002, but if you look she gave one of the main speeches in support of going to war back when congress voted on the bill. Basically it all comes down to flashy posturing and the belief that people are to dumb to realize the actually situation. A belief that is firmly founded.

Answer 4

the Iraq Study Group cant do any thing because Mr.George Bush behave exactly like a doctator.he dont want to hear bad news and this is the real problem if he still that USA will lose in both Iraq and Afghanstsn
this is first time that Idologia make the policy of USA and not pragmatizim

Answer 5

This report is a joke. It is full of bureaucrats who have no standing to comment on a military issue.

We have to stay in Iraq until they can defend themselves.

The terrorists come in from Iran and Syria.

Answer 6

for all those people who think that those 60,000 enemy combants killed/captured is good.think about this

How many do you think where created because of the Iraq war??

He's going to have to listen, i dont know if it will chnage the situatio dor not,but somthing needs to change,

Answer 7

Not to trivialize American soldier deaths, but 60,000 enemy combatants DEAD!

Answer 8

Yes they'll make matters worse!

Answer 9

Well, they say it is time for diplomacy http://www.justclap.com/story.php?title=With-military-options-limited-its-time-Plan-B-Diplomacy buy you never know.

Answer 10

Untill Bush asshole is at hel of affairs all will have to suffer my dear friend.