God is God is God and nothing else!!! God created man, not bacteria then it became man!!!!!!?

Question

im stil in skool actually im 15, n do u knw y i dnt hav da same crisis as u its coz God's in ma hart, n its nt a question its a statement bt to use dis fing they automaticaly ad a question mark, n u fink ur smart, its da 1st tym im usin dis n i worked dat out alredy. n if u fink u com frm apes, nast filthy monkeys, ur low bt gd fr u, i hav som pride in wher i com frm.
oh n i typ lyk dis coz im 15, i AM literate unlyk som ppl, (callin no names)

Answer 1

A statement is not a question just because you put a question mark at the end after five exclamation points.

Answer 2

Write properly, you goon! The implication of so many religions that the rest of the life on this planet after Man is somehow second class really annoys me. If God created man in his image - blah, blah, blah, etc, etc - what is the point of the rest of the natural world, excepting the stuff we eat to survive? I'm thinking specifically of deep ocean or isolated jungle habitats which haven't been or cannot be explored by man. If the natural world is just eye-candy for the human race, why are there species out there which we've yet to discover, and how can you explain fossilised remains which were laid down before Man came to be, the dinosaurs for instance? If you're a creationist and believe that God created everything in that one week, why aren't palaeontologists pulling out human remains from the same strata which yield dinosaur bones? Or did we just have a knack for steering clear of tar-pits? And give bacteria a break; your body couldn't function properly without them!

Answer 3

As far as I can tell this is a statement and not a question. However even though I am an atheist and I suspect the originator of such a rant would love to do me physical harm believing the answer to the question, "What would Jesus do? is, “Jesus would burn the heathen alive.” still I will try to be helpful. Any reasoning atheist would see this as a tautological argument and could easily prove it of little or no value in debate. Read the definition of tautology at the provided link and avoid using it in favor of stronger more valid arguments. You might be correct and would therefore get your reward in the afterlife but unless you learn to be a more compelling spokesperson for your faith the only victories you will know this side of the grave will be in exchanges with mental midgets. Your passion on the topic is great but you may do better with valid logic and less redundant punctuation. I sincerely wish you well in your endeavor to enlighten us heathens, the soul you save may be my own.

Answer 4

First off.if you are in school you really should pay attention more and learn to spell so that everyone can read it not just a select few from goodness knows where

Now God is another matter. It really is not FACT that he exists other than in the confines of your own mind and your own beliefs. So don't push your belief onto others like myself. I don't push mine onto you. I believe that I am as good a person as you believe you are. You are a believer and I am not so where do we go from here. Does he exist or not who "really" knows. Nobody comes back to tell of "the other side"

Answer 5

Once upon a time, long, long ago, in a world very different from today, some chemicals accumulated in a pond. Many, many years passed while the beneficient rays on the Sun shone down on the the mix of chemicals, occasionally lightning would strike the pond. As time passed, the mix of chemicals became more and more concentrated and eventually some amino acids formed. This continued for a long, long, long time, then, lo and behold, all of a sudden, a marvellous thing happened, the amino acids spontaneously sprung into life forming the first-ever living cell.

This is one simplified version of the evolutionary origin of life fable.- - - - Incredible! If you believe this you will believe anything. By the way - - - How about the story of Alice in Wonderland?

NOW THE SCIENTIFIC TRUTH
INFORMATION
Information is not life, but the information in cells is essential for all living things. Information is a necessary prerequisite for life.
Life is nonmaterial, and it is not information, but both entities, matter and information, are essential for life.
Information is nonmaterial, but it requires material media for storage and transmission.

Information Theory states:
THEOREM 27: Any model for the origin of life (and of information) based solely on physical and/or chemical processes, is inherently false
THEOREM 28: There is no known law of nature, no known process and no known sequence of events which can cause information to arise by itself in matter.

"How did stupid atoms spontaneously write their own software . . .? Nobody knows . . . . Davies.P., Life force, New Scientist 163 (2204):27-30 18/9/99.

The well tested Law of Biogenesis says that life cannot spontaneously generate of its own accord from non-life.
.
Klaus Dose reviewing the conclusions of the 7th international conference on the origins of life (Mainz 10th - 15th July 1983) in association with the 4th congress of the ISSOL, writes: “A further puzzle remains, namely the question of the origin of biological information, i.e. the information residing in our genes today.” “The spontaneous formation of simple nucleotides of even of poly-nucleotides which were able to be replicated on the pre-biotic earth, should now be regarded as improbable in the light of the very many unsuccessful experiments in this regard.

The famous cosmologist Sir Fred Hoyle. “I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognise that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could not have been arrived at by natural processes here on the Earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty at understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so. The others are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles.” New Scientist 19th Nov 1981. P526.

Nuclear physicist Hermann Schneider on the ‘Big Bang’: “In the evolution model the natural laws have to describe the origin of all things* in the macro and micro cosmos, as well as their operation. But this overtaxes the laws of nature.” Zeitschrift factum 1981, Nr.3, pp.26-33. *(including life)

Answer 6

I am not going to use circular reasoning to convince anone of who God is or what He did. Anyone can look around and see the marvoulous works of God. The only thing I can tell you is to have faith and study the Word of God. Here are some good authors to read - John MacArthur, RC Sproul, DA Carson, Josh, McDowel - they all have great books proving the existance of God.

Answer 7

According to Genesis, God created man from DIRT. Where do you think that bacteria was???????

Besides, you'd have to first confirm which creation story in Genesis is the Absolute Truth. The first 2 chapters contradict each other in the order which things were created. They both can't be Absolute Truth.

Answer 8

Stop shouting, it's not nice. Ask questions, that is what this place is for. Use some vowels, the fact that you are 15 should have no bearing on your ability to type. Everyone sees the Divine differently, can you not accept that?

Answer 9

Give me the proof,the whole proof and nothing but the proof
I don't want the reasons for your faith they concern you and no one else,There are more intelligent theories put forward by greater intellects for the non existence of any gods. unlike the zealots of all religions who only have faith and cannot understand why most intelligent people require a little more than a blind obedience. Please leave me and my fellow atheists alone we have the brains and wit to examine the available evidence and make our own minds up. Your false gods and mindless faith have no part in our lives

Answer 10

nasty filthy monkeys??

Do you know if you got enough monkeys together with typewriters for an infinite time they'd eventually produce the complete works of shakespeare.

however if we got a large number of you and locked you in a room for a million years, you still wouldn't be able to produce a coherent sentence!

Answer 11

You have so much ignorance for one so young. Such a pity you choose to advertise this aspect of yourself on a worldwide medium.

Do the world a favour - if you're not going to remove yourself from the gene pool, at least get yourself sterilised to stop the rot, there's a good girl.