English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHy did he exrocize people and throw the demons in animal bodies?

2006-12-06 08:05:33 · 6 answers · asked by badferret 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

why did he kill a fig tree just because it was out of season?

2006-12-06 08:06:11 · update #1

6 answers

in those days intteracial marriage was not allowed
The demonds begged to go into the pigs so He allowed it

2006-12-06 08:08:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Since you didn't bother to quote chapter and verse on the first question, I won't bother to respond to it.

Second one, from Mark 8:30 - 32. Jesus commanded the demons to leave a person. They requested that they be allowed to go into the pigs, He allowed them to. Jesus owns everything and has firm control of demons. They do nothing without His permission

Third,
1.Mat_21:19
And when he saw a fig-tree in the way ... - This tree was standing in the public road.
It was therefore common property and anyone might lawfully use its fruit. Mark says Mar_11:13, “Seeing a fig-tree afar off, having leaves, he came,” etc. Not far off “from the road,” but at a considerable distance from the place where he was. Having loaves, and appearing healthy and luxuriant, they presumed that there would be fruit on it. Mark says Mar_11:13, “he came, if haply he might find anything thereon.” That is, judging from the “appearance” of the tree, it was “probable” that there would be fruit on it. We are not to suppose that our Lord was ignorant of the true condition of the tree, but he acted according to the appearance of things; being a man as well as divine, he acted, of course, as people do act in such circumstances.
And found nothing thereon but leaves only - Mark Mar_11:13 gives as a reason for this that “the time of figs was not yet.” That is, the time “of gathering” the figs was not yet, or had not passed. It was a time when figs were ripe or suitable to eat, or he would not have gone to it, expecting to find them; but the time of gathering them had not passed, and it was to be presumed that they were still on the tree. This took place on the week of the Passover, or in the beginning of April. Figs, in Palestine, are commonly ripe at the Passover. The summer in Palestine begins in March, and it is no uncommon thing that figs should be eatable in April. It is said that they sometimes produce fruit the year round.
Mark Mar_11:12-13 says that this took place on the morning of the day on which he purified the temple. Matthew would lead us to suppose that it was on the day following. Matthew records briefly what Mark records more “fully.” Matthew states the fact that the fig-tree was barren and withered away, without regarding minutely the order or the circumstances in which the event took place. There is no contradiction, because Matthew does not affirm that this took place on the morning after the temple was cleansed, though he places it in that order; nor does he say that a day did not elapse after the fig-tree was cursed before the disciples discovered that it was withered, though he does not affirm that it was so. Such circumstantial variations, where there is no positive contradiction, go greatly to confirm the truth of a narrative. They show that the writers were honest men, and did not “conspire” to deceive the world.
And said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee ... - Mark calls this “cursing” the tree Mar_11:21. The word “curse,” as used by him, does not imply “anger,” or disappointment, or malice. It means only “devoting it to destruction,” or causing it to wither away. All the “curse” that was pronounced was in the words “that no fruit should grow on it.” The Jews used the word “curse” not as always implying “wrath or anger,” but to devote to “death,” or to any kind of destruction, Heb_6:8. It has been commonly thought that the Saviour performed this miracle to denote the sudden “withering away” or destruction of the Jewish people. They, like the fig-tree, promised fair. That was full of leaves, and they full of professions. Yet both were equally barren; and as that was destroyed, so they were soon to be. It was certain that this would be a good “illustration” of the destruction of the Jewish people, but there is no evidence that Jesus intended it as such, and without such evidence we have no right to say that was its meaning. “And presently the fig-tree withered away.” That is, before another day. See Mark. It is probable that they were passing directly onward, and did not stop then to consider it. Matthew does not affirm that it withered “away in their presence,” and Mark affirms that they made the discovery on the morning after it was “cursed.”

2006-12-06 08:15:56 · answer #2 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 1 0

Sometimes a generalization is used to make a point.

The value of a man is very great.

The fig tree did not bear good fruit.

2006-12-06 08:11:06 · answer #3 · answered by BigPappa 5 · 2 0

Racist comments about the cannanites?
Just where in the bible did he do that?
Why bother with this stupid questions of yours? You sound like a very ignorant person.
Forget you!

2006-12-06 08:11:28 · answer #4 · answered by venom! 6 · 1 0

First of all , he was not perfect. He was a Jewish Rabbi, no more or no less human than you or I. It was the Paulines (followers of Paul the Apostate) who who turned him into the suffering servant Messiah who was perfect, was it not?

Second of all, Jesus was racist just like most Jews of his time. However, he overcame his prejudice later on. Look at the parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritans were hated more than the Canaanites by the Jews.

2006-12-06 08:10:18 · answer #5 · answered by Byron A 3 · 1 3

That character in the Bible was written by racist people.

2006-12-06 08:06:43 · answer #6 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers