It would be interesting to know...= Z
2006-12-05 16:19:56 · 8 answers · asked by *~SoL~ * Pashaa del Ñuñcaa. 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable...
2006-12-05 16:23:48 · answer #1 · answered by tn_lovett 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kant was a believer in deontology, which is a life dedicated to simply following the rules of society that have proven over time to be beneficial to the whole of humanity, not just a singular individual. This rule based philosophy easily ties into the most faiths, including Christianity, of which I am an member. That is because of scriptural texts such as the Ten Commandments, which Jews adhere to as well. But most people, including Christians such as myself, become philosophical utilitarians when the need arises (breaking a rule/law when it seems unfair to an individual). Everyone vacillates back and forth as needed.
2006-12-05 16:33:46 · answer #2 · answered by Turnhog 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not very Religious, but seeing as Kant's Nominal world could be a description of sort of heaven (no time or space) I would imagine that they could accept his views whole hearted. I doubt many of them would actually understand it seeing as I only have very limited understanding of it and I keep an open mind to everything.
2006-12-05 16:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not religious, but I've noticed a lot of religious people cite Kant because his philosophy "left the door open" for theism.
2006-12-05 16:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he is an empirical concrete believer. If he can experience it in nature and it is empirical then it must exist. He can only specualte about the existiance of God. It's like having a red ball behind a person who never has seen it and will never see it. Does that mean it dosen't exist? The person has no empirical proof it exists because they have never seen heard tasted smelled or seen it. That dosen't mean it dosen't exist. I find him very concrete in his philosophy.
2006-12-05 16:34:17 · answer #5 · answered by xx_muggles_xx 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
only curious!?!? Nasty boy… :-) yet appreciate: this is captivating, particularly, wherein heavily linguistic way this way of shaggy dog tale would be provided here! expensive community audio gadget – you will understand in case you hear the German pronounciation of the nicely-enjoyed logician's final call (only replace the 1st 2 letters "Ka" by employing "cu") … ;-)
2016-10-14 03:03:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just another person who couldn't make up his mind.
2006-12-05 16:32:05 · answer #7 · answered by azar_and_bath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They probably think it's shite because it's not written by God and there for inferior.
2006-12-05 16:21:23 · answer #8 · answered by Abtsolutely 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋