I know the 18 ages longer, but I haven't tried it out yet. I've only had regular one. I want to buy my BF the good stuff, but some of my friends say that they pretty much taste the same, but the 18 is only priced higher. Any comment?
2006-12-05 13:03:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink ➔ Beer, Wine & Spirits
6 years. However, if you compare the price:quality ratio, the 18 is not worth the money.
Either take the 12 or the 21 (Royal Salute). The 21 will have significantly smoother, more refined taste and it leaves a long sweet aftertaste.
2006-12-05 13:20:08 · answer #1 · answered by protos2222222 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate that sh!t. I will drink just about anything other than Chivas Regal and Miller Lite. I think that they make it with clown a**holes. No, wait that's Sunny Delight. I am sure that Chivas Regal is made with something equally disgusting I don't understand why anyone buys that stuff. I really don't.
2016-05-22 22:44:42 · answer #2 · answered by Cheryl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The difference is 6 years.
2006-12-05 13:12:48 · answer #3 · answered by Bacchus H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 18 year will be smoother.
I would buy him the Glenlevit 15 year french oak reserve tho.
2006-12-05 17:17:23 · answer #4 · answered by hurricanemercedes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mumble, mumble, six years difference and just a bit smoother smoky overtones. If he likes his scotch go for it. there's also glenfiddich a good single malt scotch....
2006-12-05 13:13:07 · answer #5 · answered by CWB 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no thank you, i don't drink
2006-12-05 13:14:24 · answer #6 · answered by Tyler G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋