What would be the pros and cons of globally open borders?

Answer 1

Pro: We would experience an economic state that is closer to the full realization of the true potential of capitalism.

Pro: Those who are too stupid, lazy, or flawed will die off or evolve.

Answer 2

There would be mostly negative consequences. Unfortunately, not all governments are created equal, and natural resources are limited. In countries where governments treated people fairly, and opportunity was plenty, there would be a huge population boom. At some point a level will be reached that stretches the resources of those countries. this would end up making the lives of the average person less well off.
The people leaving the other countries would generally be the most able bodied and educated. These are the workers and thinkers who could run the local economy, or make changes in their government. The local goverment would stay in power and the lives of those left would be worse.

Answer 3

i do no longer think any united states of america could have open borders. A stability needs to be saved. If a rustic has openings that cannot be crammed with the aid of a Citizen of their very own with the aid of all skill discover somebody suitable with the aid of yet another united states of america to fill it. yet while there's a lot unemployment why open the borders to different unemployed people from different united states of america's? It places vast tension on well being care , welfare, housing and colleges. I comprehend people choose a greater efficient existence for themselves yet while it destructive aspects sinking a rustic and ripping it of its components governments could be clever.

Answer 4

Gee, I can't think of even one pro.

Answer 5

I am pro amnesty, but I reckon that there are no pros to open borders.