I'd sue the drunk driver. A lot of times, if there aren't serious injuries, they don't come out unless you specifically say that you want one there because he was drunk.
I hope your injuries have healed and you're not still hurting.
2006-12-05 13:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless there are ACTUAL violations of the law which the police can witness, they cannot simply choose to arrest anyone, so it's not clear at all what action you expect hem to take. Certainly, after 15 complaints with nothing to go on, the police would stop listening to you. Ever hear of the the Bow Who Cried Wolf? That's you, constantly complaining about things that obviously are not illegal, until even actual crimes will be ignored. In any event, your police department is not legally REQUIRED to act on your complaints, If there is evidence of gross negligence, you can have the State Attorney General investigate, but you'd have to have some real facts to convince them to act. You cannot under any circumstances sue for lack of action on their part.
2016-05-22 22:43:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cheryl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a statute of limitations when it comes to accident reports. Rule of thumb is ussually two years but it differs from state to state. Another rule of thumb amongst most lawyers i work with is no matter if you feel hurt or not, always and i mean always call 911 and tell them you've been hurt in an accident, because if you don't you give up a lot of your rights for recourse of action. So yes you may have some things to go on for a lawsuit.
2006-12-05 12:56:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by kyle_presley2002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can still file a police report. Just go to the local department office (or Headquarters) and do so. If they tell you you can't, ask to speak to the Shift Commander or Watch Commander...explain your situation.
If you're still not satisfied, file a complaint with the Internal Affairs division within the department.
2006-12-05 13:26:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can always sue for just about anything. What's the purpose of this lawsuit? Do you want to make a statement? The dispatcher determined an officer was not necessary. I suggest dropping the issue altogether.
2006-12-05 12:54:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by spag 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
U Know what this is just to answer the Kyle_Pres guy: I know for ah fact thet their is more then ah 2 yr limit, i also know the facts as ah victim of Laywers,Judges,Pig reports, et my '90' case with the one & onle JASON ALLEN VOIGHT the New York trigger man& the United States KILLER. for all i know u r one of the asses in thet case. u want to tell me why JASON CAN KILL AND GO PARTY WITH THE PIGS AFTER HE KILLS? LUVNHUGZ1@yahoo.com HEY:mrg5150 I can't do thet in MICHIGAN either, do u know how meny people i have tried to talk to, most are part of thet integral ****, MONROE,MICHIGAN IS ONE OF THEIR HOMES FOR THE CRIMES. I HAVE BLOGGED OVER AH THOUSAND PIECES OF EVIDENCE AGAINST THE STATE(S). VOIGHT is still running the streets, the enforcement hasn't done anything to or about him as of yet.
2006-12-05 13:36:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dawn M G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Someone forgot to take their meds today.
2006-12-05 20:17:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋