If you could cure any one disease/affliction (AIDS, Cancer, Spinal meningitis, whatever...) What would you cure, and why?
(I'm at work and really bored)
2006-12-05 11:33:53 · 10 answers · asked by Dick Richie 2 in Health ➔ Other - Health
If I could cure any disease it would be SARs and Lime Disease. Because SARs travels uneblieveably quickily causing a deadly epidemic but not that near the Black Plague and Lime Disease is the reason many people don't get pets. Or keep there pets captivated in there houses because there afraid of ticks
Ticks+Human=Lime Disease
2006-12-05 11:37:24 · answer #1 · answered by BS1017 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot of unorthodox health advice has always been quackery. And people should always be wary of fast-talking mail-order outfits selling miracle cures. On the other hand, a lot of orthodox medical advice has been--and continues to be--quackery too. But the medical industry is very dignified and powerful, and they don't like to use the word "quackery" when describing themselves. And they don't like to acknowledge the fact that they have a long history of sickening and killing enormous numbers of people with their bad advice. And they don't like to acknowledge that alternative medical treatments are often not quackery at all, and actually save a lot of lives. When it comes to cancer, you can't really do much worse than what the medical industry will give you. They will cut you, bombard you with poisonous radiation, and pump extremely toxic poisons into your veins. That's it. Three choices. Take your pick. They've been doing the same thing for decades, and the result is that there is an entrenched establishment of surgeons, radiologists, and chemo-therapists, all of whom have a vested interest in resisting innovation. And in return for the "treatments" they offer, they expect you to give them everything you're worth. Because they got into the cancer business to make money. And their overall success rate is nothing to brag about. According to figures from the National Institutes of Health, the overall cancer rate in America in 1970 was about 400 cases per 100,000 population. In 2009 it was about 465 cases per 100,000. It is "estimated" that only 1 out of 100,000 people experience spontaneous remissions of various cancers. But the problem is that there is simply no way to study the phenomenon objectively, and so it is only a wild guess. By contrast, a recent specific study of small breast tumors that was conducted in Scandinavia found that 22% of them spontaneously disappeared. And of course, the bottom line is that if the medicos actually say that a cancer is "incurable," then what would a person possibly have to lose by then ignoring the cutters and the radiators and poisoners, and trying healthy lifestyle changes instead?
2016-05-22 22:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Eczema! Eczema is a group of skin conditions that cause skin to become red, irritated, itchy, and sometimes develop small, fluid-filled bumps that become moist and ooze. It is killing my skin.
Alzheimers would be another one of my incurable diseases to cure. Alzheimer’s (AHLZ-high-merz) disease is a progressive brain disorder that gradually destroys a person’s memory and ability to learn, reason, make judgments, communicate and carry out daily activities. As Alzheimer’s progresses, individuals may also experience changes in personality and behavior, such as anxiety, suspiciousness or agitation, as well as delusions or hallucinations.
2006-12-05 11:48:53 · answer #3 · answered by stephaniea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would cure the number one killer of all mankind in the world.
Natural Causes
2006-12-05 19:22:12 · answer #4 · answered by peedeecreek 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cancer...they're just many different kinds and its about time that got cured.
2006-12-05 11:51:01 · answer #5 · answered by ♫ giD∑■η ♫ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not an illness persay, but it definity is a plauge on humanity. Stupidity. plain and simple, and not the, "i don't know the anwser to this math thing" kind of stupid, i mean the "Let's use a grenade to clean the chimney" stupid. They are out there.
2006-12-05 11:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Doctor Cornbread 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitley AIDS.
2006-12-05 11:36:53 · answer #7 · answered by noszhe12 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
aids because it would save the most people then cancer
2006-12-05 11:50:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cancer. Why? Because I would still have my mom, and not have to explain to my children why Grammy is visiting Jesus and not them.
2006-12-05 11:40:21 · answer #9 · answered by Sassyazzrican 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cancer, I would still have a lot of my friends and my brother.
2006-12-05 12:05:46 · answer #10 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋