I totally agree with your questions! It's like a tornado ripped through Oklahoma and left a beautiful city! It makes no sence! All the things around us are proof that a divine creator is present.
2006-12-05 11:35:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by em_bim23 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
This has nothing to do with evolution, and the answer is no one knows. Physicists may speculate, but they know that any extapolation passes a limit, Planck time, through which physics has no tools to peer. The big bang is the manifestation of the creation of the universe, whether or not it was by divine will.
Your question may be somewhat foolish, but I find there are enough fools on both sides of the existence of God.
2006-12-05 12:17:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a lot of banging LOL! For the millionth time, I'll explain it. At the point of the the big bang, space and time touched. The time/space before that is not known at this time because it exists in another dimension, Einstein already proved this, I'll let you do the reading yourself. However, just because we cannot explain something (yet) DOES NOT mean that the Bible, or any other simplistic explanation is correct. Before you go about explaining your theories on how the universe was created, I would spend a lot of time researching quantum physics. After all, you don't just randomly try to explain brain surgery without the proper education? Then why do you try to explain the creation of the universe that way???
2006-12-05 11:36:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, the beginnings of the universe really are a separate matter than evolution.
I'm not a scientist, but I believe that there is a science board here on Yahoo!, so I'd imagine someone there would be capable of explaining the Big Bang to you.
Also: why introduce magic into the thing unnecessarily? It is more logical to say that a universe is eternal than to say that a magic being is eternal and spoke/spat/ejaculated the universe out. I, therefore, propose leaving out the middle man.
2006-12-05 11:38:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by N 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Big Bang doesn't state that "objects. . . bang together." It states that universe was, at one point, a very small dense object with a lot of energy. The energy caused this point to become unstable and, well, bang!
It is your decision whether or not to disagree with the Big Bang theory, but at least learn about it first and don't create a strawman please.
2006-12-05 11:39:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by abulafia24 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
you are right. the big bang theory does not answer the question of what happened before the big bang or what or who caused it. God may have begun the universe with a big bang, but that does not mean he did not exist or create man or earth. it is dodging the question, not answering it. So any big bang is irrelevant.
2006-12-05 11:35:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
firstly, I would never be so arrogant to say that person is foolish for believing in God.
secondly, and I mean this with the greatest of respect to anyone reading, the only way a person can argue defensively against any scientific theory is by studying the science themselves objectively...
2006-12-05 11:41:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by town_cl0wn 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
75-80% of America claims to be Christian. Add in other religions and you reach almost 95% Atheists are near 1-2%. So. We a a group of people calling religion fantasy. They align themselves with other western countries- Britain, etc..... Where a major minority considers the bible fantasy, fables.
So, we have an extreme minority, telling an extreme majority, that, they have it all wrong. Add to it the politics and self promotion a scientist must use to stay alive. You are not published, you die. So, what will get them published. Theoreticians walk a tight rope and will grab anything to stay up.
2006-12-05 11:35:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by TCFKAYM 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe in the Big Bang Theory..... God said, "BANG!" and it was. :o)
No one can honestly believe the world is as intricate as it is, with so many forms of life, or even consider the movements of their own hand as they type on here could be anything but the creation of some intelligent form of life or being.
2006-12-05 11:45:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by newbiegranny 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
According to most models, the Big Bang was the beginning of time (at least for our universe). There simply wasn't anything before it; there COULDN'T have been anything before it. This does not violate standard physical laws.
2006-12-05 11:34:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋