English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Those are two different questions, so here are my two answers:

1. Unemployment benefits that you receive from the state are taxable by the IRS, so in general you would file a tax return. That said, if you aren't sure if you need to file a return, find out from the IRS Form 1040 instructions. (web address 2 below) It's page 12.

2. No, your fiance may not claim your son as his dependent. The reason is, the IRS requires a dependent child to be your "Son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, or a descendant of any of them (for example, your grandchild, niece, or nephew)." However, if your fiance becomes your husband before Dec. 31st, then your child is at least a qualifying child, because he's then your husband's stepchild. However, there are other requirements to actually claiming someone as a dependent. You can read about those on page 19 of the Form 1040 instructions.

2006-12-05 10:25:58 · answer #1 · answered by dkarlsenyh 3 · 0 0

The only reason for a unemployed person to fill out taxes is if he made over the minimum amount during the year or will receive a refund. A finance can't put your son down unless he is his relative. If he is the father you better consult a tax expert.

2006-12-05 09:58:11 · answer #2 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 0 0

In general, if you made taxable income, you should file a tax return. Unemployment compensation is taxable. It is true that if you make under a certain amount in a given year you are not required to file a tax return (see page 12 of this document: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040gi.pdf). However, that amount is very low (eg, $8,450 for a single individual under the age of 65). Also, if you had any taxes withheld you should file even if you are not required to in order to get your refund. You may also get earned income credit or child tax credit, which you won't get if you don't file.
Regarding your son, if he lived with your fiance and he/she provided more than 50% of his support, then he can be her dependent for Federal purposes (see page 20 of above document). Keep in mind, though, that if your fiance claims him, you cannot. I can't speak for your state as far as dependency. Each state has it's own rules and you should refer to the state web site for more assistance.

2006-12-05 10:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by noname 2 · 0 0

Consult with a qualified tax advisor. The rules have changed quite a bit in this area, effective for the 2006 tax year. There are a number of issues at stake and you need to be sure that you get them all right -- filing status, exemptions, etc.

(All of the above answers are possibly wrong, but without qualified tax advice you can't be sure.)

2006-12-05 10:28:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 1 0

you're no longer head of companion and youngsters. HOH prestige demands a heavily proper blood relative so which you do no longer qualify. they're non-kin, so as that they'd desire to fulfill each and all of the standards of unrelated dependents below the "qualifying relative" regulations so you might declare them. you only get their exemptions. No newborn tax credit, no EIC, and no head of companion and youngsters prestige. you do no longer p.c. a sort from him to declare them. in the event that they meet the regulations to be your dependents then you definitely can declare them no count if he likes it or no longer. form 8332 only works for passing tax advantages from a custodial parent to the non-custodial parent. in view which you're no longer a parent, the form is irrelevant. EDIT: in view that all 3 of the different solutions so a tactics are incorrect concerning the dependency regulations, this is a link to ebook 501. with the intention to declare an unrelated guy or woman as based they'd desire to fulfill ALL of those regulations: a million. they are no longer the qualifying newborn of yet another taxpayer 2. Lived with you ALL year (no longer only 6 months) 3. that they had an earnings below $3700 4. you provided over 0.5 of their help 5. your living subject would not violate community rules

2016-10-14 02:27:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends on what state you are in, usally if you make under $8000 a year you are exempt.
No your fiance can not claim your son. He can only be claimed once, you or the boys father. Unless he adopted the boy.

2006-12-05 09:58:00 · answer #6 · answered by FC 3 · 0 1

1> If you received unemployment compensation or any other income, then yes you must fill out tax returns.

2> Unless it is his son too, then no, until you are married he cannot use him as a deduction.

2006-12-05 09:57:14 · answer #7 · answered by quagi m 3 · 0 1

I think it is Tax FRAUD if your fiance puts your son as a dependent on his taxes!

2006-12-05 09:56:46 · answer #8 · answered by newyorkgal71 7 · 0 1

he can only claim your son if he can prove that he lives with him and he contributed more than 50% of his support for the past year.

2006-12-05 10:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by roy40372 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers