2006-12-05 09:39:43 · 20 answers · asked by richardstz19 3 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
Depends on what you mean by BAD. If you mean BAD Actors, I would give it to Van Damme first, he is one BAD actor.
In a real deal fight the worst of the three again is Van Damme. So picking the worst of the three is easy.
The better of the two left, hard to say now, NOrris is still alive and Lee is not and their primes are far past their times. So I guess that puts Norris as number one because he is still alive and Lee is not, and Van Dammes career is also dead.
2006-12-06 13:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by Legend Gates Shotokan Karate 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would go with none of the above... Bruce Lee was great although he was beaten by Yip Man (older Wing Chun master). He also is dead so he doesn't have my vote. Chuck Norris is good and there are lot of funny websites that say thinks like, "Did you know Chuck Norris's tears can cure cancer? To bad he has never cried, EVER. Chuck Norris doesn't go hunting. That would imply there is a chance. Chuck Norris goes killing." Chuck Norris is older and not in his best fighting shape right now.
Van Damme is the champion of where? He is an action movie star (what was the last movie he made?).
Anyway, Chuck Liddell and Tito Oritz are bad dudes. Even in their prime this would be some fun fights to watch.
2006-12-06 05:10:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bruce Lee
2006-12-07 02:59:34 · answer #3 · answered by fe_fe3000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order:
1. Bruce Lee - Most effective and disciplined Martial artist of "OUR" time.
2. Chuck Norris - great fighter, ruled the ring for several years as did many of his students. Don't let the Hollywood bling fool you he was a stud.
3. Van damme was made for movies and demonstrations. He was a good martial artist, not great and did have moderate success in the ring, no major wins though.
2006-12-05 15:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by kenpo_mushin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chuck Norris , champion kickboxer !!!
Bruce Lee , sadly he's dead.
Jean Claude Van Damme ,he's a gymnist and a very bad actor .
2006-12-06 15:17:54 · answer #5 · answered by Ray H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bruce lee with a close second to chuck norris....van damme does not deserve to be used in the same breathe as those two.
2006-12-05 13:35:39 · answer #6 · answered by JuJitsu_Fan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're evaluating 2 distinctive persons in each way. bruce substitute right into a flashy indidvidual that didnt unavoidably liked the attention, yet truly enjoyed the spotlight. You cant argue the impact hes had on american way of existence. After he got here out together with his video clips, human beings have been imitating his strikes. Chuck, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that substitute right into a champion fighter. no longer sayin who could have gained in a real combat, cuz thats one for the a protracted time there, yet chuck is greater humble, i think of than bruce. I say bruce, in simple terms because of the fact of his impact he has had on human beings.
2016-12-18 08:00:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bruce Lee.......because he's bruce lee. he was a much more well rounded fighter than chuck norris.
van damme? are you kidding me? hes good in movies. if van damme really wanted to impress me, he'd step in the ring w/tito ortiz.
2006-12-05 15:49:04 · answer #8 · answered by ffemt1280 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bruce Lee whip Kareem Abdul Jabbar.
2006-12-05 10:25:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
EW! but van damme gets my vote. Chuck norris is looked at as a joke and bruce lee... well come on bruce.. stop trying to be an actor! Your only good at kicking ***...
Van Damme just kicks *** and he knows it, loves it and doesn't try to be anything else.
2006-12-05 09:42:45 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Jose 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋