He initiated creation most initially and commenced it originally, without undergoing reflection, without making use of any experiment, without innovating any movement, and without experiencing any aspiration of mind. He allotted all things their times, put together their variations gave them their properties, and determined their features knowing them before creating them, realising fully their limits and confines and appreciating their propensities and intricacies.
When Almighty created the openings of atmosphere, expanse of firmament and strata of winds, He flowed into it water whose waves were stormy and whose surges leapt one over the other. He loaded it on dashing wind and breaking typhoons, ordered them to shed it back (as rain), gave the wind control over the vigour of the rain, and acquainted it with its limitations. The wind blew under it while water flowed furiously over it.
Then Almighty created forth wind and made its movement sterile, perpetuated its position, intensified its motion and spread it far and wide. Then He ordered the wind to raise up deep waters and to intensify the waves of the oceans. So the wind churned it like the churning of curd and pushed it fiercely into the firmament throwing its front position on the rear and the stationary on the flowing till its level was raised and the surface was full of foam. Then Almighty raised the foam on to the open wind and vast firmament and made therefrom the seven skies and made the lower one as a stationary surge and the upper one as protective ceiling and a high edifice without any pole to support it or nail to hold it together. Then He decorated them with stars and the light of meteors and hung in it the shining sun and effulgent moon under the revolving sky, moving ceiling and rotating firmament.
2006-12-05 08:08:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
This was written 1400 years ago science did not even exist then
2006-12-05 08:10:07 · update #1
Listen to this.
http://atheistdelusion.cf.huffingtonpost.com/
2006-12-05 08:15:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Biology, chemistry, and physics are all closely related to the current theory of evolution. The theory states that all three had a part in the "creation" of the first "living" organism. I use quotations because there is a very broad definition of life regarding very small organisms, not to mention we really have no proof of exactly what happened so many billions of years ago. Why did I get down-voted? Am I wrong? My answer has nothing to do with religion, so put that out of your mind.
2016-05-22 21:57:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"the upper one as protective ceiling and a high edifice without any pole to support it or nail to hold it together. Then He decorated them with stars and the light of meteors and hung in it the shining sun and effulgent moon under the revolving sky, moving ceiling and rotating firmament. "
Evolution of what?
Do you mean that space evolved from a ceiling with stars painted on it into a 3 dimensional space of infinite volume?
2006-12-05 08:13:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This isn't anything at all like evolution. How can you be so retarded as to think that it is? This is creationism plain and simple and it is just dead wrong as an explanation of the origin of the universe. You ought to know that by now.
Study a little harder and use a different book next time - you're looking in the wrong place if you really want to understand how the universe evolved.
Duh.
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.
2006-12-05 08:24:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope! You are using a creator. Your using the bible to justify evolution through religion. Evolution according to the bible does not exist. According to the bible, we were born in the image we are today, wrong! How do you call that evolution? You are writing rhetoric.
2006-12-05 08:13:38 · answer #5 · answered by Maikeru 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is why it is so asinine, huh? Wind generated waves do not churn the deep waters, Mr. Cousteau.
2006-12-05 08:13:00 · answer #6 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I love mythology. Creation stories only vary slightly but they're fun to imagine.
2006-12-05 08:14:13 · answer #7 · answered by Miss. Bliss 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. It isn't.
Edit: "This was written 1400 years ago science did not even exist then"
Yeah. It shows.
2006-12-05 08:10:36 · answer #8 · answered by The Resurrectionist 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope, not even close. It's a poor translation, and science had been invented.
2006-12-05 08:52:24 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the hell are you talking about? This is the most bass-ackwards story I've ever heard.
2006-12-05 08:14:34 · answer #10 · answered by boukenger 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋