2006-12-05 07:20:45 · 34 answers · asked by I'm Sparticus 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
please explain further what you mean Julia. I agree withbut i don't undertand what u mean on a personal level. We all have to battle, surely?
2006-12-05 08:08:23 · update #1
Because good and bad are subjective. What is good for one is bad for another. We might say mosquitos are bad and kill them off - only to find that 8 other species relied upon mosquitos for their survival. It is not up to us to make decisions for all humanity based upon our perception of their good or bad qualities.
Peace!
2006-12-05 07:26:01 · answer #1 · answered by carole 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the positive side of bad is seen all around us , the context of your framework is the only thing that moves , has a flexible landscape. To say something is bad is to admit to the fact that you accept something as good and as an entity with the selfish need to satisfy everything you need to have. We are all obviously all driven by what we call call free will but on analysis we are only really responding to positive stimuli from ourselves and others , we are really creatures of habit and the only thing that confuses the issue is language and our use of it , if you thinkk there is anything outsuide of us the n fair play but to confuse the issue with god is an awful mistake . god is a thing of faith requiring no proof , to destroy demands proof. Relax and know in not Knowing which means to be proofless ,, without unfounded love and loyalty you fall into the same category as most of the rest- [proove it and we shall believe and feed the cofffers of the sinless- they dont exist . Get with the program , dont care who i offend , biggots are self defeating anyway
2006-12-05 07:40:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't the act of destroying "bad"? All in perspective, love...
"Bad" is simply the duality of "Good"...we learn through bad, we enjoy those lessons in good...See? Just a part of life here, it was set up that way, and we seem to have engrossed ourselves in leaving it at that. All serves purpose, all is created by those that need the purposes, and hopefully all will see this process and become from it...your free will choice always plays part...See?
Enjoy the all of it...Good Journey!
2006-12-05 07:30:49 · answer #3 · answered by MsET 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're assuming that you're the righteous one. Good and bad is a matter of perception. By destroying, you mean killing, right? Thou shalt not kill. The Nazis had the same idea, that they were right to destroy the "bad" Jews and look what that type of thinking resulted in: The Holocaust. You're on very shaky moral ground here, my friend.
2006-12-05 07:23:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because there's no consensus on the meaning of "bad." In almost every case, it just means "what I don't like." And having carte blanche to destroy everything we don't like would make the world even more of a hell than it already is.
2006-12-05 07:24:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the thought from where destruction comes itself is bad! Only through Love and Peace can there be good!
2006-12-05 07:24:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing good or bad, but thinking makes it so. Who are you to say what is good and what's bad - it's a judgement call. Destruction is bad in and of itself. The only thing you can or should try to control is YOURSELF. So try to destroy all that is bad in yourself, and live according to what you think is good and right. That is all any of us can control - trying to re-shape society according to our ideals is a bad, judgemental and narcissistic idea.
2006-12-05 07:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will not be enough hours in a day to do all of that. I suggest that
people who believe in the powers of prayers, do so to change the hearts of persons who create and believe that being bad is ""OK"".
2006-12-05 07:27:44 · answer #8 · answered by Seeanna 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from a radical Wahabist terorist's perspective, everythnig western is bad.
from an Idaho Aryan white supremacist, anything non-caucasian is bad.
there are 6 billion definitions of "bad."
whose definition of "bad" do we follow? (don't EVEN ssay "god's;" that's the whole dang problem in the world today)
2006-12-05 07:30:25 · answer #9 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can't destroy everything evil. As soon as we eliminated everyone that we considered evil, evil would be born anew in someone else. Evil is not an individual, a place, or an object, it is a spirit, and you can't kill a spirit.
Only God can (and will) ultimately destroy evil.
2006-12-05 07:26:52 · answer #10 · answered by Daniel A: Zionist Pig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋