Girls you should be ashamed of yourselves. To say that parts of somebodies genitalia have to be cut off is the same justification that is used for the stone-age mutilations of women in Africa. The male's foreskin is part of his body and he has a right to have it the way he was born.
Get out of the dark ages, stop all mutilations.
To the girl that claims he will have a lower chance of getting AIDs, how do you know that he is even at risk? He may not screw around like a common whore. How do you know he will come to appreciate being maimed? You don't have the first clue what it is like.
2006-12-09 03:24:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bakerylady 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
A man is just as entitled to a complete body as a woman is! He doesn't need surgery to be socially acceptable any more than a woman would.
If you didn't sign a consent form to have your nipples removed or part of your clit removed and you woke up to find them gone you would be pissed too.
A foreskin does not cause infections or diseases, a uncircumcised man gets them from the same place as a circumcised man gets them, a diseased ****.
I am a circumcised man and even I know the hygiene and STD stories are all B.S. All that is needed for an uncircumcised penis is soap, water and condoms, you need that with a circumcised one too.
BTW it did not state that the abscess had anything to do with the foreskin! In a country where circumcision is rare this poor fellow ran into one of the few doctors that didn't know how to treat an intact penis. Dumbass doctor must have been trained in the U.S.
You are pretty damn generous with someone elses "bits" considering yours are protected by law, you have no idea what it is to be mutilated. And yes, it is mutilation; it leaves a scar doesn't it?
If you think this doctor is so great, why don't you book a flight to Germany so he can operate on you too? Be interesting to see what he cuts off of you.
2006-12-08 17:39:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, the doctor did him a favor by removing his foreskin (foreskins are nasty, disgusting and a resivoir for disease) the doctor should be suing him for getting a free circumcision!
2006-12-05 03:27:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The doctor removed it to prevent complications -- the guy had an abcess for crying out loud. Better to lose the forskin than the whole thing!
2006-12-05 03:27:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by WonderWoman 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
People are happy to sue some one for any reason...as long as they are sure of getting (1) Publicity, (2) Money
2006-12-05 03:26:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, seems the man is plain stupid. He should be glad and happy to get rid of that dirty piece of skin calle foreskin.
So much cleaner, so lower risk of contracting AIDS...
I'm sure he will eventually appreciate the benefits.
2006-12-05 07:24:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scuba 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
yeah we know that but legaly the doctor still had to have permission to take the forteskin. If he wants it back it is his choice and the doctor has to do it
2006-12-05 03:28:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kim 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
when you take off the foreskin sex is suppose to be better.. just live with! be a man...
2006-12-05 03:29:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by lala15 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
The man is an complete idiot
2006-12-06 08:51:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by popibz 2
·
0⤊
2⤋