Couldn't we just keep a few.. You know.. as pets? OK, fine for reprodiction also. I agree a world ran by woman would be a far better place. Safer too.
2006-12-05 02:27:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by jessica a 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lmao, who comes up with this rubbish? Serious responses yet what you seem to say is "men are to blame for everything, they all need to die" - "drastic action"
Firstly, the world would be a nicer place without humans full stop, we upset the natural order of things and do nothing but breed and destroy.
As for a women only planet - rape and paedphilia... a woman in the paper has been prisoned for having sex with 13 and 14 year old boys, covers both of those. Enviroment... cause women don't pollute or use copious amounts hairspray.
2006-12-05 02:38:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by cybermoose1982 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think this would be the answer to rape, wars, etc. That is just part of human existence as we have made it. There are times that I have felt the safest in the arms of a good man. No doubt, there are some bad people in this world, but that is our own doing. Our society is the way it is because we have made it this way. There are women who have done far worse than rape and such. Look around at the world we all built together. We can complain all day long, but that doesn't do anything either.
2006-12-05 02:26:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by OnE GiRL 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women can also be violent, and be abusers too....i don't really think just because if they there were no men that the world would be necessarily a better place...besides how would the human race continue without men and women to procreate....human race would not be the same we need both sex's to create a balance....but when talking about people like paedophiles, and rape the person who do such things are without conscience, or feeling for another human being they are driven by their own selfish, and perverted wants, and to have power over another human being....these people the world would be better off without, but that's in an ideal world.
2006-12-05 02:28:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
>>would that mean the end of wars
No, last I checked women could join the army too, and maggie thatcher was quite prepared to have a war
>>rape
Not all rapists are male, a friend of mine got raped by a female actually
>>paedophilia
I'll admit that i've yet to see a female paedophile on the tv, but I'm sure they exist.
>>environment
A touching idea but most women really don't care, so definitely not.
As far as 'for the human race to survive', that's rather shortsighted, I suppose you'd freeze 400 generations of sperm to continue the human race or clone testicles and turn all women asexual?
I don't know where you come from, but women are just as guilty as males when it comes to all of the above. And it's still important to remember it's only a small percentage of people anyway (except the environment, that's more like 90%).
2006-12-05 02:31:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Modern Jesus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL
We gave you life! It was you who screwed up our world. You took the fruit from the forbidden tree. You first sinned. So you have to live with it. Live with the curse of always wanting what you can not have. Keep on looking for Mr. Romeo, Mr Knight in Shining Armor, or should I say, shining Wallet.
When you find him, I hope he rips your heart out, like you ripped out so many in the past. Think about it. You tore out some really nice guys hearts didn't you? And for what? Because you thought the grass was greener on the other side.
You need to learn where your place is in this world. It's cooking the dinner the man brings you. It's cleaning up his house. And pleasing him in the bed room. Until you learn how to appreciate the man, you'll never find happiness!
2006-12-05 02:25:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by almondjoy_1000 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't think eliminating men is the answer. IMHO the answer is to quit promoting sex in advertising, movies, tv shows, books, etc. And to make people responsible for setting good examples to the children of today. They are products of their environment, so when the environment changes, the problem will change.
Also, by eliminating men, you've just eliminated the human race.
2006-12-05 02:25:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Momma Jo 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your only interested in a serious responce!!!!!! then why put such a stupid question on here? Oh no, no ten points for me.... ops, dont give a shi*t. So you saying if there were just women you would all get on... bullshi*t!!!! woman cant have a small gathering without one of them bitching about something.... and there have been no murders by woman have there.... ops, yes there are, rose west, the moors murders etc etc. I could go on but i need to sort out my socks.
2006-12-05 02:26:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by 2 good 2 miss 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
As Queen Latifah said in Living Single (this is not a quote. I'm paraphrasing!)
If there were no men, this world would be full of fat, happy lesbians and no crime!
But no, the environment would not be safe. Do you ever watch TV? There are a lot of women who are just as evil as men.
2006-12-05 02:23:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by tinkerbell24 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
il make a few poimnts. Women do rape there are female paeodephiles, so no that part wouldn't stop no and you've forgotten we need men to procreate too tere would be no people after this generation if there were no men!!!
I mean also men are great at fixing stuff(yes probably something THEY broke) but men are great!
It may be more widely known men rapists,abuser's act but females do it too sorry to inform you sweetie
2006-12-05 02:25:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by rosa_govan 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hate to break it to you, but there are nasty women too. Who shall decide who goes and who stays? Women have started wars too. Violence and disregard for the environment are not gender specific faults, but traits of the people who make this world much less than it could be. Sad. Concentrate on brightening your own little corner of the world and be good to good people.
2006-12-05 02:26:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋