2006-12-05 01:51:53 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
From here on out, gravitational theory should be called "Intelligent Falling".:-)
Funny how they gripe about science, but use a computer to do their griping, isn't it?
I seem the morons are already marching in. Get a clue folks!
Evolution is FACT.
The THEORY concerns the mechanisms behind evolution.
Ditto for gravity. It's a FACT; but we still have gravitational theory.
2006-12-05 01:54:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
haha
If anyone who missed the point wants an eduction - that evolution occurs and has occurred is scientific facts. HOW and WHY it occurs is the subject of a scientific theory. Same with gravity and electricity. Theory is the peak in the language of science when referring to complicated how and why. Such theories do NOT become scientific laws.
Scientific laws are observations that simple things happen, they are below theories, and are more like assumptions in a way. The law of gravity is an old, simple mathematical expression, which doesn't alway hold true. The theory of gravity is 'above' the law of gravity.
But I think I'm wasting my time.
2006-12-05 10:50:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
As a matter of fact, they do. If you press the point while asking about the attractive forces between masses and the electromagnetic forces between charged areas, they'll say that those things happen because "God" causes them to happen. If you were to insist that instead they happen because of those forces, the creationist will deny reality in that context as well.
Honesty is not a value for creationists - truth is utterly unimportant to them. Evolution is a fact, folks. Storming in here claiming otherwise doesn't change that fact. Get your facts straight before you post, or you come off looking like just another creationist liar.
2006-12-05 09:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Gravity and electricity are observable and testable. Macro-evolution has never been observed, is not testable nor falsifiable. I have had evolutionists send me "proof" of speciation, and when I look it over I am really disappointed to find it is only more evidence for micro-evolution, not macro-evolution. And contrary to all logic, Darwinian scientists are so desperate to confirm their belief that they just sort of arbitrarily extrapolate the evidence for micro-evolution as a confirmation of macro-evolution. The fact is, evolution as a theory does not have the same observable, testable, and falsifiable evidence as gravity or electricity.
So I will try asking again, can you present observable, testable evidence of one species mutating into an entirely different species? If you can't, how can you avoid the conclusion that belief in evolution is on faith?
2006-12-05 11:04:21 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel M 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Isn't it called "the theory of evolution"? Anyway, Creationists do not have to deny evolution in its whole, but only as a theory for the creation of all species and life on the Earth. There is no evidence to support the idea all life came from one species. In fact, there is evidence to the contrary. It is possible to believe that the world and species thereon were created by a God, and that these species are able to evolve. They are not mutually exclusive ideas. I believe in God and I understand evolution. The end of your question is just immature and unworthy of response.
2006-12-05 11:00:17 · answer #5 · answered by straightup 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
True, the theory of evolution is worth reconsideration as there are new thoughts on the beginning of life on earth. One such school of thought believes that complex organic material generated from stars could have been transported to the solar system and could be a possible cause of life on earth!
2006-12-05 09:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Sami V 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If evolution is a fact, then why do evolutionists make the theory then look for evidence to support it. I think it should be the other way around...find evidenve then make a theory. And as for gravity and electricity, God made you why couldn't he make those things also. Possibly, a theory is a theory, and not worth that much hate and anger toward other people. Why do you seek the affrimation of other people to know what you think, feel, believe?
2006-12-05 10:04:48 · answer #7 · answered by jme e 2 · 1⤊ 5⤋
LOL. Many of these answers not only show an ignorance toward evolution, but science in general. Some of these answers are so priceless and obviously written by people who can't even begin to think for themselves. It is actually a little funny, but not too funny considering our public school systems have failed them so much.
2006-12-05 11:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evolution is based on a collection of facts and assumptions.
Creation is based on a collection of facts and beliefs (assumptions in reality).
Both take faith to fully believe because man cannot prove many parts of creation OR evolution so there are many assumptions. I know I sound like a broken record but you catch my point.
Gravity and Electricity are based on facts as far as I know. Last I checked the principle of gravity was not a theory but a proven force. Same with electricity, they can prove it.
They cannot prove that there is a God who created us as the Bible says.
They cannot prove that the earth was a result of a large explosion in space (or whatever the 1,300 other theories say happened).
So whatever you believe, so be it. But evolution in my book is a theory as well as creation. Electricity and gravity I would consider facts.
2006-12-05 10:00:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
A few of them disproved gravity, but they went flying off the Earth,
They've all disproven electricity since they're living in the dark.
2006-12-05 10:34:00 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋