English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

examine and address the validity of this document
http://www.truthbeknown.com/origins.htm

(all 6 pages) with emphasis on pg. 4

Thank you.

2006-12-05 00:59:56 · 6 answers · asked by vanislandwitch 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

I didn't have to read for long to know its crap.

2006-12-05 01:02:52 · answer #1 · answered by Gods child 6 · 1 1

No competent scholar, Christian or pagan, denies that Jesus of Nazareth lived, and was crucified by the Romans in Jerusalem, about A.D. 30. That is simply a fact, Jack.! Your "document" as you call it, is a bunch of lies designed to reach those who are unlearned and foolish. There is no validity to it.

2006-12-05 09:13:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Bible isn't the only sourse we have to prove that there is such a person as Jesus and that he was the messiah. The Book of Mormon is one, Josephus is another. Plus the Meriad of other documents.

2006-12-05 09:24:17 · answer #3 · answered by princezelph 4 · 0 0

The existence of Jesus cannot be disproven. There is no new information to glean from. with that being said, there is no way someone could disprove Jesus existence today being that it could not be done 2,000 years ago. I have read enough information that directly points to the existence of the hisotrical Jesus. No serious scholar doubt His existince. I have been to Israel... He definetly existed. What we most scholars debate is His Diety and Not His Existence.

2006-12-05 09:14:55 · answer #4 · answered by Pastor 1 · 0 0

The early "leaders" of the First Century Church proclaimed Jesus Crucified and Risen. Nearly all of them were executed for the Faith. If they knew the Resurrection were a lie, they would not have died for a lie.

I Corinthians 15
IF Christ be not risen, then ....
But Christ IS RISEN from the dead ....and become the firstfruits of those who sleep (in death).

2006-12-05 09:25:56 · answer #5 · answered by kent chatham 5 · 0 0

it's not a religious document, it's a document about a religion.

Did Dan Brown collaborate on this one too?

2006-12-05 09:03:54 · answer #6 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers