planting democracy is not a military mission
thanks to all those who went there
world is safer minus Saddam
time to come home
2006-12-05 00:24:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Umm Rumsfeld is NOT still in power...he was replaced. It has nothing to do with the election. And he was not the only reason that we were still there, so why would everything just magically change b/c he is gone? Leaving now is a mistake as much as I would hate to go back over there. So quit wishing for it. And Stoner, get a life. No way you should include yourself and say "we" are running around, b/c if you were in the military, you wouldn't call it a "gun".
2006-12-05 00:44:28 · answer #1 · answered by ashley b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I seriously am starting to believe that the troops staying there was a "prerequisite" to Mr. Rumsfeld leaving office
2006-12-05 00:33:01 · answer #2 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Iraq is not about planting democracy or a war on terror. It's really all about the winning of THIS secret "prize"!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-12-05 01:25:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
RUMSFELD IS STILL IN CHARGE.
UNTIL DEMO'S TAKE OVER 2007.
USA TROOPS SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN REGARDLESS OF SITUATION IN IRAQ.
LET OTHER COUNTRIES PROVIDE DEFENSE IF DESIRED.
BUSH SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH THIS HORRIBLE CRIME.
2006-12-05 00:33:02 · answer #4 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows, They gave us one reason for being there after another. Unless the impeach Bush we'll never get to the truth.
2006-12-05 20:28:03 · answer #5 · answered by zeroartmac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'd think, but we're having waaay too much fun running around with guns shooting Iraqis. Sorry about that
2006-12-05 00:27:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree that our troops need to come home. But if they do now, all that we worked for will be undone. That gov. will colapse.
2006-12-05 00:26:40 · answer #7 · answered by Saint 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋