I certainly hope so, but only after we got the success rate up above 95% or so.
2006-12-04 19:50:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fact that people who look for Christ to return generally expect to see him in the skies with their natural eyes no doubt helps explain why so many today fail to take seriously Christ’s return. However, could it be that Christ has returned but is invisibly present? That is exactly what the Scriptures teach.
Jesus said of himself: “The bread that I shall give is my flesh in behalf of the life of the world.” (John 6:51) Having laid down his fleshly life for the life of the world, he could not take it back. And so we read: “Why, even Christ died once for all time concerning sins, a righteous person for unrighteous ones, that he might lead you to God, he being put to death in the flesh, but being made alive in the spirit.” As a mighty invisible spirit creature, the resurrected Jesus “dwells in an unapproachable light,” and “not one of men has seen or can see” him.—1 Pet. 3:18; 1 Tim. 6:16.
But perhaps you are now asking, Then how are we to understand the words of Revelation 1:7: “Look! He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him”? The Bible speaks of two kinds of sight. Thus Jesus on one occasion said that his religious opposers were ‘blind guides leading the blind and that both would fall into a pit.’ (Matt. 15:14) Obviously Jesus did not mean that they were literally or physically blind, but that they were blind as to their understanding.
So when you read that every eye will see Jesus you may be certain that, since the Word of God cannot contradict itself, what is referred to is figurative sight. Yes, there will come a time when all the earth will be made aware of Christ’s presence when he begins to execute the wicked.—2 Thess. 1:6-10.
There is reason to believe, from Biblical parallels, such as Jesus’ cleansing the temple three and a half years after his being anointed as King, that it was three and a half years after Jesus was installed as King, or in 1918, that Jesus in heaven turned his attention to the judging of his faithful followers who make up the spiritual temple. At that time he rewarded those sleeping in death with a resurrection to heavenly glory. As the apostle Paul foretold, when Christ returned then “those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first.”—1 Thess. 4:16; Matt. 21:12-17.
2006-12-04 20:00:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anuja 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Jesus pbuh raised towards heaven Alive.
There are more than 70 prophecies of Muhammad pbuh about arrival of Jesus pbuh and also anti-christ.
Read Quran and Hadice for purusal.
2006-12-04 19:58:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe in cloning, but what I do know as a Muslim is that we also believe Jesus will be coming back to save humanity. Jesus has another name is Islam though (though refers to the same person).
2006-12-04 19:53:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Omar Z 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christ is the Holy Spirit, and He manifests again as Holy Spirit.
Christ is not the proper name of an ordinary man; He is at the station of Prophethood, Who leads mankind to all truth.
DNA is common matter in the body of man and the animal.
The Holy Spirit is the Supreme Spirit, Who creates and nurtures all creatures visible and invisible.
2006-12-04 19:57:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I just think it is interesting that if one were to examine the DNA of Jesus that half of it would be God's DNA since God was the father.... Wonder what THAT would look like????
2006-12-04 19:56:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by skypiercer 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That would only be a corporeal Jesus, a real let down.
2006-12-04 19:52:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a spiritual matter. Men cannot force the hand of G-d with cloning. my opinion...plus lots of bible examples
blessings
David
2006-12-04 20:01:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by David T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it would be illegal everywhere, But I'm sure that some Muslim would try to prove Jesus wasn't the son of God by doing so if he could.
2006-12-04 19:53:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know. I think that it was what was in the flesh, not the flesh itself. And there lies the crux of the entire arguement.
2006-12-04 19:53:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
0⤊
0⤋