do u think the iranian president is in the wrong 4 building nuclear weapons?

Question

Iran is joining the nuclear countries but the US & UK feel threatened by it and believe that the weapons should be destroyed. But they didn't stop to consider this when they got nuclear weapons(aka weapons of "mass destruction").

Answer 1

The Iranian president himself is not very powerful; he's merely the public face of the ruling mullahs. That said, the government of Iran is likely pursuing nuclear weapons development.

Several nations in the region, Israel, Pakistan and India, have nuclear weapons. There is a prestige value as well as a defensive value and a deterrent value. For example, the US has not threatened Pakistan even though it is governed by a military dictator, harbors Osama Bin Laden, and the original Al Qaeda band who actually attacked the US, and has sold nuclear technology to others, including terrorists.

Answer 2

How about a quick history lesson Bucko?

When the US developed our 1st nuclear weapon(s) we were at war with Germany and Japan; both seeking world domination. The Nazi/German scientist were also racing to build atomic weapons to attack Russia, the UK and the US.

When we succeed in developing the weapon it was in the effort to win the World War and defeat Japan and Germany before they used their's on us had they finished first. That is the reason why the US did not consider destroying our nuclear weapons. It would have exposed us to nuclear attack if Japan or Germany had completed theirs first. That can't possibly compare to Iran's stated goal to erased Israel (or any country or that matter) from existence.

Is Iran at war with a country also in a race to built a nuclear weapon1st to avoid destruction by Iran? Answer...NO.

And what proof can you provide that the USA or the UK would ever attack Iran with nukes unless Iran used nukes first? Proof please...not rhetoric.

Answer 3

This whole nuke debacle is just a phase we're going through. Believe it or not, crossbows were once deemed "Weapons of mass destruction."

I swear, we went through the same crap with bronze, with iron, with steel, and now with nukes. Everybody want's to be the baddest little soldier on the block, but all they do is whine when somebody else gets a new toy under the tree.

My opinion's worth what you paid for it, but I think it'd be cool if the countries who have nuclear capabilities gave the information and resources to EVERY country. That way we could all just go about our business, and let the blase be blase. Geez, we've had this stuff for fifty years, we all know the potential for cataclysm. I suspect even the terrorists don't want to go THAT far, if only to protect themselves.

In short, no. I think his idea of building nukes is long overdue. More power to him.

Answer 4

i'm neither iranian nor muslim yet so a tactics as i heard, the killer is a russian-german, he have a germany passport and that qualifies him as german. as for the president of iran, i think of he's only voicing his concerns regarding a pregnant muslim female being killed in a courtroom room. i in my opinion do no longer even understand the way a guy or woman would be allowed in a courtroom room with a knife. human beings have rights and that's the comparable reason while the iranian regime overwhelmed the protesters, the international have aired their concerns and germany grow to be no exception. i heavily do no longer supply a crap concerning the iranian president cos i'm no longer iranian nor from the boastful western powers who had subject concerns with iran for a protracted time yet i only think of from time to time the international would desire to be finding in any respect part..by employing the way, grow to be it only the iranian president who voiced his concern concerning the killing? otherwise why single him out? to be user-friendly, the iranian president attacking germany for the killing of an egyptian pregnant female isn't something different than yet another political pork that existed between the west and iran for some years.

Answer 5

yes -Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons...
In fact Iran needs a different president one that is not willing to sacrifice his country and it's people simply to full fill HIS delusional desire to gain world esteem.
The people of IRAN USED to be considered as rational, intelligent and accomplished people..yet they clearly appear willing to lose everything- including their next generation ..
WHY??? weapons in the hands of a their president will produce what benefit for the population???OIL once burned or contaminated is useless.......can Iran exist without oil???

Answer 6

I guess none of that really matters since the threat of invasion by Iran, would/could never happen (except for the dummies that keep coming to the US- tax free), I hope we bomb that country to smithereens soon.

HEY SADDAM, every time you post that picture, you will be reported, soon you'll just ...disappear.

Answer 7

Iran and the U.S. are enemys. Is it a good idea to let your enemies build weapons to destroy your country? Didn't think so.

Answer 8

I'll be honest, I don't want Iran to have Nukes... However, if I saw my neighbor get its *** handed to them and the leader of the country put on death row, AND my enemies were surrounding me, Nukes might be attractive to me as well.

Answer 9

the Iranian have the right to get nuclear weapons.
US or others threatening have no meaning, since Iranian are not Arab ( Arabs are immature !!!), although they are Muslims.

Answer 10

evry country should have nukes. period