A mother took her baby daughter to get both of their ears pierced. The child got her ears pierced, but the mother was unable to have hers done because it was against the law...why?
2006-12-04 19:15:10 · 6 answers · asked by єЖтяα ¢яιѕρψ 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Jokes & Riddles
The mother was under-age and had to have her mother's permission.
2006-12-04 19:19:23 · answer #1 · answered by mightymite1957 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the mother was underage, you have to be at least 18, i think to have your ears peirced without parents present. but since the mother was present on her child getting her ears peirced, they were done...
2006-12-05 03:19:48 · answer #2 · answered by amber 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well its obvious shes underage and didnt have her parents permision. Thandx 4 a good lauhg and a good riddle
2006-12-05 04:12:34 · answer #3 · answered by KrystalKlear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Under age and needed parental consent.
2006-12-05 05:00:25 · answer #4 · answered by Hardrock 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
under age ...agree with all tha other peoplez
2006-12-05 03:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by )*-*sweet*-*( 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That too funny.
2006-12-05 03:30:32 · answer #6 · answered by Reese 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋