Debunking Creationist theory, please view link?

Question

I would encourage all creationsists to view the information in this link. It shows you the truth about the scientists behind creationists and shows that less than ONE TENTH OF ONE PERCENT OF SCIENTISTS BELIEVE CREATIONISM IS IN FACT TRUE (or more valid that evolution)
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA111.html


So my question is, how can you still claim to such a poor argument?

This survey was conducted by an UNBIASED survey group, unlike most of the statistics that creationists point to

nice work avoiding the question justin, keep up that denial

sweetie, you are a moron. Evolution is not a poor argument, 99% of scientists believe in it, and they spend their lives studying it.

Justin, you are calling the gallup group biased???? man you are so in denial it is hilarious!!!!!

Answer 1

Isn't it interesting that within seconds of posting this, you already had thumbs down votes? Those who do believe in the mythical theories over science are so dead set on believing without basis that, without even taking the time to click the link, will vote you down for trying to burst through their fact protection bubble.

Only serves to prove that they know the facts disproving them are there, and refuse to acknowledge them, for fear of having to admit that they've wasted their time.

Edit: Um Justin? Science never once believed the earth was flat. Religion did. Christianity also taught that the sun revolved around the earth, until science proved otherwise. Religion, and most especially christianity, has been the basis for most of the way people think about issues UNTIL science comes along and finds out the truth. Get your facts straight.

Answer 2

The only argument there is that the majority of scientists believe in evolution. I didnt see any evidence of evolution other than the fact that it said "there is evidence of evolution"

Most of the so called "missing links" or transitional species have been found to be frauds. One supposed missing link was on display at an acclaimed museum for 60 years. And then was found to be an orangutan jaw and a human skull held together by chewing gum.

I ddint see anything on that link to debunk creationism.

God bless,
Shane

Answer 3

Scientists are fallible men. I believe in a perfect infallible God. I don't have to see, tast, touch, smell, or hear Him to know He created this world and everything in it. That is faith! All a scientist will ever be able to do is rely on his own fallible senses to prove fact. Don't get me wrong; I fully support science for the purpose of medicine and finding ways to help our world. But to fully reject God because some man said we came from money's and has yet to prove that theory? I think not! However, if you like big bangs and monkey's maybe you should see a doctor.

Answer 4

Ok? So 99.9 percent of scientists dont believe in creation...hmmm...consider that the most influential scientists throughout history were creationists. (Roger Bacon, Johannes Kepler, George Washington Carver, I could go on.) It is always funny to see what an atheist will try to pass off as evidence.

Answer 5

all of the animals i've got ever considered provide start to different animals of the comparable species. In my 50 years, i've got yet to work out or pay attention of a monkey giving start to a human whether it may seem achievable with present day technology and the means to implant a human fetius from one lady into yet another. are you able to tutor to me that evolution is genuine and authentic? i've got on no account examine or heard something that has unquestionably confident me yet. The State of Tennessee v. Scopes (alsoknown a "The Scopes Monkey Trial") is definitely certainly one of the main in demand, properly-publicised question of evolution as against creation ever recorded, whether the criminal question became into "Did Scopes wreck Tennessee regulation while he taught evolution interior the lecture room?" In front of the courthouse stands a commemorative plaque erected with the aid of the Tennessee historic value: 2B 23 THE SCOPES TRIAL right here, from July 10 to 21, 1925 John Thomas Scopes, a County extreme college instructor, became into tried for coaching that a guy descended from a decrease order of animals in violation of a these days handed state regulation. William Jennings Bryan assisted the prosecution; Clarence Darrow, Arthur Garfield Hays, and Dudley field Malone the protection. Scopes became into convicted. The question of which college evolution or creation became into wonderful became into on no account spoke back.

Answer 6

I believe that the world was created in such a way as to confound and confuse the intelligent who have no faith...

by the way... your site is not a peer reviewed subject site.. so it carries very little weight in the scientific world...

in other words.. it is created and maintained by biased people to support their side without further thought...

and.. as a religious person.. I don't need to justify or explain my point of view or beliefs.. all I have to do is believe them.

Answer 7

Their financial support comes from grants that taxpayers and private donors give them and they have to come up with SOMETHING, or else they would have to get another job, right? (I hear McDonald's is hiring) So every so often they publish some paper on their "findings", and I find it hard to see, when the reasoning behind their research is all financial, (and the Gospel is FREE), why would anyone Choose to back a bunch of educated idiots whos sole premise is to make money, and to stretch their research out over decades to try to disprove God? They never have, and they never will! It's throwing good money after bad!

Answer 8

why is it only in the USA that the mention of creationism as a credible alternative to evolution isn't met with people rolling on the ground laughing?

Answer 9

Look at it this way . Before something can evolve it first has to be created.there is no getting around this fact.

Answer 10

ya know...there was one time when science was certain the earth was flat.


but i forgot...ths is the age of "science doesn't make mistakes"


btw ...the source you listed is NOT unbiased because i did a paper on creation/evolution last year, and my teacher gave us biased sources for both points of view...and that one was under "evolution".

nice try though. i 'll give you points for effort.

i am calling that source biased,,,but hey that is just coming from a university professor, who happens to also favor evolution.

ya but i cant even tie my own shoes,,,,,i surewould like to learn a lot from you....i dont know any better you see. i am just dumb simple hick folk....