Rather amazed you were adult enough to use protection. Well done!
Otherwise, I think children should stick to children's stuff as long as they possibly can. We have so many years to do adult things later on.
2006-12-04 10:56:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by NotsoaNonymous 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
10! My children still had babysitters at this age! Where were your parents? Why were you left alone to even have a chance to do this! Why did you even know what to do? Obviously, neither of your parents took the time to talk to you about NOT doing this for a while or the consquences. Where the heck did you get the "protection"? The only people that think this is cool are those that are about as old as you! Type in HPV in yahoo google! Learn about this STD that many of our teens now have! It can cause cancer in girls and goes undetected in boys! Talk to an adult about sex, someone you can trust, sex is not just an act, it should have emotional strings attached. Im not sure who I feel more sorry for, you, or the young girl, or both your parents. Sorry if im being harsh but someone has to be!
2006-12-04 18:59:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
OK, 10-11 years old is really young. Are you really sure that you were ready? If you were, did you really love and care about the other person, or were they just a sex toy to you? At least you used protection, but you were at a really young age, and even with protection, you aren't invincible to STD's and teenage pregnancy. Take my advice, just be careful doing that at your age. Having said that, I know people who had sex at 13 or so, and they said they were fully ready. It's a matter of personal opinion.
2006-12-04 19:04:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by dayle123 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
10 or 11 is way too young! I think having sex at 17(like I did) is immature. Sex is supposed to be about love, and I know that some people think at young ages that they know love but they don't know real love by 10 or 15 or 17. A good age, in my opinion, to think about having sex is 18 years old. With that said, at least you used protection.
2006-12-04 18:56:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by jojot001 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Im maybe that is to young but underage at 15 or 16 I think is fun if only you are the younger one, The other end... why would you do stuff with someone 10 to 20 years younger? but aslong as both are happy then go for it.
2006-12-04 18:56:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mike 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your thinking with the wrong head. Your both are way too young to be having sex. And both way to young too be handling the consequences if your protection fails. Taxpayers are already burdened down raising unwanted kids.
2006-12-04 19:21:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by April M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
WOW 10-11 even thou i don't plan on waiting 4 marrige i think 10-11 is too young ur not even full going thro puberty and u've already had sex i think u should have waited for a person u luv and full cared about.
2006-12-04 18:56:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i don't think 10 yr olds are mature enough to understand the true value of sex, especially the emotional love side of things..
2006-12-04 18:54:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jeff 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
i think you guys were a little to young to have sex, but if you used protection and knew what you were doing then i guess its fine. just seems a little young that's all
2006-12-04 18:54:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Underage sex is wrong, and if I catch you doing it again, I'll hang you up by your Buster Brown!
2006-12-04 18:58:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋