Is Iraq a Quagmire?

Question

It is frequently used metaphorically by non-military persons to describe military campaigns characterized by small hope of victory, ( Like the Iraq war ) poorly-defined objectives and/or no clear exit strategy.

Answer 1

George W Bush has aggravated and complicated a long term conflict that time and history will show to be one of the all time biggest blunders of the western world.

Answer 2

No more than Korea, Cuba and the former Yugoslavia quagmires for the U.S. and Mexico and Columbia are quagmires in general.

Iraq's president did define an exit strategy though. That would be June 2007, which is the time he says Iraq's police and military should be on their own. The military objectives did exist, but the media didn't care much about them. They were to create a Democratically elected government, to build 3,200 infrastucture projects, to hand back land to the Iraqi government and to train the police and soldiers of Iraq. Iraq has a Democratically elected government. Bush said Iraq's police and soldiers will be trained by the end of the year. Bush said Iraq will have 50% of their land back in Iraq's control by the end of this year. 82% (2,624) of those projects have been completed as of August 2006. That leaves 574 projects to go as of August.

Answer 3

I only are not getting why there is any extra argument at this element. there is one answer and one answer only, get out of Iraq. despite it takes, do it. only make effective it particularly is accomplished as properly as a threat for our troops, it particularly is time. 4 years, we've not gained something, and issues are only deteriorating. we are battling a phantom enemy we will not p.c. out till after this is too previous due and yet another American soldier dies. here is yet another little reported fact approximately this conflict in Iraq, this isn't any longer a conflict and that's yet another excuse we can in no way win with armed forces skill. If u . s . a . of america have been rather at conflict, Iraq could have been decimated previously and the U.S. armed forces may well be on top of issues. historical past tells us and the Iraqi human beings themselves are showing us only how deep the roots of their own non secular disagreements enhance. battling will bypass on no count if we are there or no longer, this is the curse of the middle-east, isn't god super? How atypical that's what's the real underlying explanation for each and all of the battling in that area.

Answer 4

If by victory you mean a military one, then yes. If you mean the objective of removing a no longer useful dictator and replacing him with a more US friendly one then no. Iraq is more of a blunder than a quagmire.

Answer 5

The democrat plan is to get the troops out today. That is according to what at least 42% of the American public voted for. Never mind that it would destabilize the middle east, disrupt the supply of oil, sky rocket the price of gas exponentially, cause economic disaster across the globe and provide a safe haven for terrorist to launch attacks against us. The American public is so wise aren't they?

Answer 6

Yes. In fact, the planet Earth is a quagmire.

Answer 7

Metaphorically, yes. I wonder if Bush know how to get out of the mess he put himself into.

Answer 8

It's way to sandy to be a quagmire. It's more of a SNAFU, with utter chaos thrown in for flavor.

Answer 9

We are being lied to. Iraq is not about a war on terror. It's really all about the winning of THIS secret "prize"!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm

Answer 10

Quicksand, and very hot Quicksand, but it ceases to be quick if you are riding a Camel!!