English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

33 answers

no..... not a sexual relationship anyway... i have a few gay friends, but i wouldnt risk sex with any that had had intercorse with another man...... that i knew about

just my choise

2006-12-04 04:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by Bmp1ksh 3 · 2 0

If I were single depends on the guy.
Most females are going to say no, why? Because females can be rather Territorial over there guy. Not only would other females be a threat but men would be too. Driving some females to the nut house....
The way I see things is, if a guy wants to be around fine if not fine...of course sex is a whole other matter lol! In this situation...can we say doctor visit?

2006-12-04 04:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow, I'm really sad to see how bi-phobic women are.

1. straight or gay or in between, you have the nearly the same chance of std's, it all depends on whether you practice safe sex and get tested!
2. straight or gay or in between, anyone can cheat or anyone can be monogamous, how awful that so many people assume just because they've been with the opposite (of you) sex that they will eventually leave you for the other sex.

I am a bi female who does prefer a monogamous relationship. I've found it really revealing that men have no problem with my interest in women, but lesbians tend to have a HUGE problem with my interest in men...

2006-12-04 04:30:00 · answer #3 · answered by zmj 4 · 0 0

no i wouldnt ever be with someone that has been with the same sex. but if you really like the guy the i say go for it. and the whole std and aids thing hell that is not just for gay people u have just as much of a chance of getting it from someone that is not gay as you can from someone that is gay. fo me i would besacred that they would cheat with the same sex that is not something that goes away. they will always have feelings for the same sex. so you have to take that chance.

2006-12-04 04:26:28 · answer #4 · answered by whiteangel 2 · 0 0

I would. A man is not defines by who he has been sexually attracked to in the past. Besdes, it's good that he expirimented wth his feelings- that means he is not afraid of self expression. I don't see the difference from if he'd been dating a woman for the past couple of months.

2006-12-04 04:23:53 · answer #5 · answered by rleerose_3 2 · 2 2

No because you wold never know if he was true to you or if he was still thinking about the guy he left. Or if he was even a tracked to you. I just wouldn't feel comfortable.

2006-12-04 04:22:01 · answer #6 · answered by manders 2 · 2 0

No. I would choose some normal man with normal relationship. I do not want to risk my life with AIDS.

2006-12-04 04:25:14 · answer #7 · answered by Cutebunny 3 · 0 1

When you say "date" what do you mean? I would date a guy...but I wouldn't ever get serious or sleep with him. What would be the point.

2006-12-04 04:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by Becky F 4 · 1 0

Why would you want to? For his oppinion on shoes and shopping? Thats the only perk I'm seeing there... Plus it's dangerous these days.

2006-12-04 04:20:57 · answer #9 · answered by love_n_hate84 2 · 3 0

No, I wouldn't. For one thing, it's wrong. Then you have to consider the fact that the person may have HIV and not even know it. Too risky.

2006-12-04 04:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by November 3 · 0 0

No way, he is not created 4 a girl

2006-12-04 04:23:26 · answer #11 · answered by JUSTGIRL 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers