yes. all they are going to end up doing is stirring the KKK up with there demands.
2006-12-03 17:05:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by loretta 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
I believe most of your respondents didn't understand your question. If I am correct, your question relates to President Regan granting General Amnesty to about 3.5 million illegals.
My wife's family benefited from that amnesty. Many of my inlaws today are American citizens.
In the late 60's they became LPRs (Legal Permanent Residents). Fortunately for America they did not sponsor other immigrants and the Chain principle did not apply.
However, I have seen more than one appliclant sponsor ten other immigrants who later came legally to the USA. If there are presently twelve million illegals who would be granted amnesty and each sponsors 0.5 others the net result would be another 6 million legal immigratnts sponsored by the now legal ones. In just a few years we would in effect give 18 million immigrants legal status. If this scenario is true where will they live?
Should Congress require resettlement evenly throughout the United States or will this responsibility fall mainly on the ten heavy immigrant states?
2006-12-03 17:58:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of that the undeniable fact that somebody comes from yet another u . s . a . could have lots result. usa remains the melting pot, the subject is the bigger the pot the longer it takes to soften something. the subject i think is that those immigrants are putting directly to their cultural identity too difficult. i'm no longer saying this is not significant to be attentive to the place you come back from, yet via coming to usa, you may desire to be arranged to alter into American. To include a minimum of to a extra robust diploma the dominant lifestyle of the rustic. conversing English could win over a huge quantity of so noted as racists. no one cares what language you communicate at homestead, or what you consume for dinner. while you're to artwork and stay mutually, you do could desire to have the potential to communicate mutually.
2016-12-29 20:56:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, I'd better pull my VW microbus out of storage and order a lava lamp!
Seriously, you're kidding, right?
I'm actually in favor of amnesty, so long as they are required to pay fines and then pay taxes, just like everyone else does. The money raised that way would pay to document new LEGAL immigrants.
2006-12-03 17:47:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Amnesty to illegals takes America to 22nd century in advance.
2006-12-03 17:10:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
More like 50's and 60's... it seems we are headed towards racism, fear, ignorance, and hatred towards other races/foreigners... OR did we ever really leave those ugly times behind us?
2006-12-03 17:08:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by WebXen 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Whats wrong with the 60's? It one of my favorite times of our generation.....A lot of social changes and many of them good, like the civil rights movement....And the music was the best and so was the design.....
2006-12-03 17:18:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Better than that lets go back to the 50"s that was when the government knew how to deal with the problems we are dealing with today.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p09s01-coop.html
2006-12-03 17:06:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
what was the illegal aliens population in the 60's.
2006-12-03 17:23:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hell I wish it were the 60's? What was the question again?
2006-12-03 17:06:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by bconehead 5
·
3⤊
2⤋