I will thank Hezbollah for kicking your Ares by the will of the almighty. Emancipate your self from mental slavery non but our selves will stop the time have no fear for atomic energy non of them can stop the time. Wont you hellllllllp me sing this song of freeeeeeeeeeeedddddooooooooooom !!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-03 16:43:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
RETURNED, you ask. It was never theirs.
All the territories the Israelis now possess are theirs by legal right -- the right conferred by the League of Nations Mandates Commission, when it carefully defined the territory which would be set aside, from the vast territories in the Middle East that had formerly been in the control of the Ottoman Turks as part of their empire, and which had been won by the Allies.
An Arab State, a Kurdish State, and a Jewish state were all promised. The Arabs got their state -- no, in the end, they got far more than their state but rather--as of 2006--22 members of the Arab League, the most richly endowed with natural resources of any states on earth, enjoying the fruits of the greatest transfer of wealth in human history The Kurds did not get their state, because by the time things had settled, Kemal Ataturk was driving a hard bargain and would not permit it.
The Jews got the Mandate for Palestine set up for the express purpose of establishing the Jewish National Home, which would inexorably become, all parties realized, in time a Jewish state. It did not seem wrong then, and does not seem wrong now, that the Jews should have a state of their own. They asked only for the right to have no barriers put up to their immigration, and no barriers put in the way of their buying land. That was it. That was the sum total of what they demanded.
Until the 1948 war, when five Arab armies attacked, not a single dunam of Arab-owned land (and remember that nearly 90% of the land, in any case, remained the possession of the state or the ruling authority, as in the Mandatory period) was appropriated. No one should dare to write about this subject without having done the research on demography, land ownership, and law.
The Israeli claim to the West Bank (as Judea and Samaria were carefully renamed by Jordan after 1948, in precisely the same way, and for the same reason, that the Romans, nearly two thousand years before, had renamed Judea as "Palestine" and Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina) is not that of a military occupier, though it is also that. The main legal and historic claim is that based on the League of Nations Mandate, which in turn, was based on a considerable historic and moral claim recognized by the educated leaders of the then-civilized world, who actually knew something of the history of the area, and were not nearly as misinformed as so many have been by the mass media, and the laziness and prejudice of journalists today.
The notion of "occupation" of course evokes imagines of Occupied Paris, or Occupied Berlin, after the war. It implies no justification for the claims of the power with the military presence. But the claim of Israel to the lands it took in 1967 are based, for the Sinai, on the standard rules of post-war settlement, the rules which have obtained for centuries, whereby a victor in a war of defense keeps what he has won. If the Israelis chose not to, or were forced not to exercise that right, it does not mean that the right did not exist. It did, and it applies even more forcefully to Gaza and the West Bank. But the claim there is not based merely on the successful conquest of territory to which otherwise Israel had no claim. It did have a claim, a claim based clearly on the Mandate for Palestine -- and like all the other League of Nations Mandates, was formally accepted, taken over as it were, by the United Nations when it came into being. This is a matter of record. It cannot be undone.
Whatever else one wishes to say about the West Bank or Gaza, the word "occupation" is a tendentious, and cruel, misnomer. What it seeks to imply, what it seeks to implant in the minds of men, is clear: Israel has no rights here. This is nonsense. This is the very reverse of the truth. Read the Mandate, and the Preamble to the Mandate, for Palestine. Then read the records of the Mandates Commission -- and especially how they reacted when the British unilaterally announced that the terms of the mandate would not be applied to Eastern Palestine -- that is, the consolation prize given to Abdullah of the Emirate of Transjordan.
2006-12-06 15:04:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I don't believe it will ever be returned to the muslims because bible prophecy states that once the "dry bones" have come together again and Israel is established as a nation, then it will never be uprooted again. If it were returned to the muslims, I would have to honest and say it would not shake my faith in Christ but would shake my faith in my understanding of scripture. I would merely return to the bible and study more and continue to place my faith in Christ.
2006-12-04 00:36:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is not going to happen.
God is letting the nations back Israel into a Corner,He is gathering the Nations to move against Israel,The so called P.L.O are a mix of Arabs,most of which were Syrians.
I worked Air Craft.,do you know what "Hail" storm does to Radar,let alone 100 lb Hail. Israel will not have to fight.
Gods fury will come up in His Face,Results 83 % of Arabs and
Russians dead,it will take 7 months to bury them
2006-12-04 01:00:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by section hand 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Israel will never be returned to the Muslims. It will (in the Christian Faith) will given to the Jews and sign a seven year treaty which will begin the judgments on Earth.
2006-12-04 00:34:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Leah 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Look man, the Jews walked into the region back whenever it was, displacing whoever lived there, then they got kicked out, then they went back when they got a bit more muscle. That's history. Will you thank whoever it is when the USA is returned to the native Americans? I didn't think so.
2006-12-04 00:41:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dr Know It All 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope
Should I thank Buddha when the Far Eastern lands invaded by Islam is returned to the peaceful people that once lived there?
Maybe I should thank Cernunnos when we give ALL of Western Europe from Turkey to the U.K. back to the Celts.
Man, you got a point there BROTHER...!!!
Let's give EVERYTHING back to the Neanderthals....!!!!
2006-12-04 09:28:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by wolf560 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will thank Allah when Muslims and Jews can get along peacefully in that land.
2006-12-04 00:44:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Heron By The Sea 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
UMMM... Hmm.. History lesson here, for you are ignorant. The Qoran stakes no claim to this land, there is no returning to "Muslims." However, it is justified to return it to whoever occupied it before the occupation. Those would be the original occupants, no matter what their reliqious beliefs.
2006-12-04 00:36:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by ¡Razón! 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why can't everyone just get along. If you think that other religions are against yours, let it go and let your God (Allah) figure it out. If he is right then all other religions will be damned in the end anyways. So why fight about it now?
2006-12-04 00:33:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pauly 3
·
2⤊
1⤋