So I want to build a perpetual motion machine but engineering is such a tough feild to do, but do I need engineering to build what I want to build. I fear I might not like a life of complex math and physics. I like cars though, Ive seen mechanics build things from the ground up. so three questions.
1. Is the life of a mechanic less difficult or more difficult than the life of a engineer?
2. Does a mechanic have the skills needed to build a perpetual motion machine? "my guees is probaly not"
3. Do I need engineering to build what I want to build?
2006-12-03 16:27:07 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Engineering
i'd say a mechanic is easier, you only really have to fix things
you don't need to be a mechanic or engineer to build a perpetual motion machine - just an active imagination.
no.
perpetual motion is very much possible, and it can be done without breaking any law of thermodynamics
anyone that tells you perpetual motion in not possible is a lazy piece of crap without a brain
check what www.wikipedia.com has to say about perpetual motion
2006-12-06 17:55:11 · answer #1 · answered by NTH IQ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry bud, but perpetual motion is impossible to achieve. However, if it were possible, I'd say you need engineering.
2006-12-04 00:36:33 · answer #2 · answered by euchred88 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
perpetual motion machine is not possible because it violates the laws of thermodynamics .
2006-12-04 00:53:17 · answer #3 · answered by geniusgearguy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋