In French we have the ground floor corresponding to "le rez-de-chausser".
Then the first floor is "le premier étage ",
the 2nd floor is "le second or deuxième étage",
the 3rd floor is "le troisième étage" and so on.
So in your case you'd say : " ma maison a 3 étages"
I hope it was what you were looking for
2006-12-03 15:06:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by kl55000 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ma maison a trois etages?
My house has 3 floors.
Just a guess, someone who has actually spoken french sometime in the last 10 years might be able to answer better.
2006-12-03 15:07:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by 006 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Questioner: I know you claim you served in Group. In deference to that, I ask you to consider: Is quoting everything from cartoon characters to comedians really an accurate representation of the French people as opposed to their government? Why is it people with nothing better to do in their lives always bag on the French and just the French? The Germans refused to fight in OIF. The Italians backed out of OIF, and never won a campaign of any consequence on their own in the Second World War. The Spanish backed out of OIF after caving into a terrorist attack on Madrid and put a socialist government in charge. No one says the Italians are cowards. No one says the Spanish are cowards. And no one for damn hell says the Germans are cowards. But the French? The French get rolled by the Germans, just like almost everyone else in Europe, and people half a century later give them a hard time for what? The Norwegians put up less of a fight. The Austrians put up less of a fight. So did the Czechs, the Poles, the Belgians, the Dutch, the Hungarians. The Romanians collaborated. And still, the French get the abuse each and every time. Why? There wouldn't even be a United States without French support during the Revolution. Does anyone actually believe if the French didn't suck up the best and brightest of the redcoats to combat on Continental Europe, that the Revolution would still have won its victories? Anyone care to remember what happened in 1812 when the British applied themselves just a bit more? Think of what would have happened if someone like Wellington was fighting Washington? Maybe people who bag on Napoleon need to read on Jena, Austerlitz, Wagram, Eylau, and a dozen other engagements where they can look for French cowardice all they want. Maybe they should read on Dien Bien Phu and say the French were cowards there as well. Maybe if people actually read a proper history of the Maquis, they won't be half as stupid with their commentary. "Russians fought with pitchforks and won" ... I'm sure that's how Zhukov took Berlin, with pitchforks. Right. Oh, and maybe, just maybe, should we ever forget, we sponsored the Baathists for nearly a decade while they were our proxies fighting the Iranians. Only the invasion of Kuwait changed that. Hell, Saddam wouldn't even have risen to eventual power if Americans hadn't taken his bankrupt, failed-assassin self and cleaned him up in Cairo where he was hiding, and given him enough support to make a run for it. So when he was killing dissidents and political opponents during the 70s and 80s, did we say anything? Not a thing. Until he screwed up in 1991, he was our man. So why the holier-than-thou attitude when our own government abandons POWs in Korea and Vietnam to the Communists and bankrolls tyrants who turn on us year after year? If accusing the French of cowardice makes some Americans feel better, fine, let it be that way. Let that NOT discolor foreign policy, as their security and intelligence services are still allied to us in the War on Terrror. And let it not ever, ever be a substitute for REAL patriotism. Over 6 million American men answered the call to arms in the Second World War. Over 5 million men had to be TURNED away. After 9/11? We still barely make replacement rates, 200,000 a year. But no, it's "I'm American because I listen to Toby Keith and drink Budweiser, even though I'm too good to enlist or be commissioned, even though half the stuff in my house is Made in China, and I work too hard to bother volunteering for something like the local fire department or the Red Cross. Instead, I'll bag on the French all day because it makes me feel better." There are too many people like that today. We face huge threats in Iran and Communist China, and more of the public spends its time bitching at a European democracy and chortling at its own jokes. Something is WRONG there. How about a lot less bitching at the wrong people and a lot more elbow grease for a change?
2016-03-14 23:52:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perfectly agree with the above answers.
J’ai une maison à trois étages.
Ma maison a trois étages.
Mark the difference between à (preposition) and a (has)
2006-12-04 01:10:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by saehli 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My house has three floors. = Ma maison a trois étages.
2006-12-03 15:08:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rei-chan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Il y a trois étages dans ma maison.
2006-12-03 16:52:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by ako lang 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avZMD
AMEN TO THAT. First, to refute somethings that wer said... the french have been fighting in africa forever because (surprise) they suck at fighting. The napoleanic wars were pointless example of french blunder. Fighting against a numerically inferior force the french STILL LOST. The day their corsican leader was sick for the first half of the day, their french substitute commanders made such egregious errors that even NAPOLEAN couldnt recover. The french had little to do with the american victory in the revolutionary war. Need the world be reminded that the french military didnt even show up until the last battle to encircle the already defeated and cornered brittish army of chumptacular cornwall? AND THEN, the restaurantuers didn't even get off their boats for a fight. great victory guys, show up when the fights already over. AGAIN, need the world be reminded that the french were going to help the confederate states in the civil war, but their "advisors" watched the south get brutalized (along with the north) at antietem and decided they didnt want to join in bloody fighting where there was any chance of defeat (a wise decision granted their track record). They're no allies of mine if you want to base it all on historical records AND MAYBE everyone needs to be reminded that the reason france didnt want to enjoin fighting in iraq was because 1) they had one of the most lucrative oil contracts in the world with that crazy dictator and 2) they'd been violating UN Sanctions and international law for nearly a decade selling saddam military equipment for their oil deals, thereby allowing him to circumvent the food for oil program and hurting the citizens of iraq. But in a world where french leaders respond with stupid things like "let them eat cake" to their starving people who need bread, who's surprised that the french didnt care about starving iraqi's either? And no one should forget that the french underground in WWII was a "framework" not a victory machine. all that "resistance" wouldnt have meant squat without millions of doughboys, brits, and russians charging accross europe for a military on military war. And lets not forget that the french LITERALLY surrendered Paris with only token resistance. German troops were knocking on the capitol of Russia's door, the russian soldiers were generally unarmed or didnt have ammo. THEY FOUGHT WITH PITCH FORKS!!! and they won. And finally, SO WHAT IF AMERICA IS POLICE MAN OF THE WORLD??? would you really want russia or china doing it? i know france certainly isn't stepping up to the plate. I know, lets just let the islamic states police the world and stone to death all dissenters.... and how about all women who think to speak their minds or don't wear burkas. Screw that, i'm american and i'll not stand for it. SPECIAL EDIT FOR THE GUY WHO POSTED AFTER ME: 1) the belgians and the poles put up more of a fight than the french in WWII, in fact, the belgian air force was decimated trying to hold off the germans. Yes, they did get steamrolled in the end, but it's better than what the french did... ie, SURRENDER. theres a difference between not putting up a fight and turning yellow to run. one is french, the other is everyone else. 2) before you make acusations, you might consider that saying american, tried tested and true is my way of saying i'm in the military. I don't drink beer and listen to toby keith as patriotism (although i do both). I pledge to fight for my country. Fight, not surrender my capitol.
2016-04-10 06:23:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
In french how does one say " my house has three floors?"?
when discribing your house to someone, and they would like to know how many floors are in your home. How would one say ( In the french language) " In my house there are three floors."
please answer this question for me. the French interpritation along with the english words and...
2015-08-20 22:41:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All the answers above are correct but u can also say :j'ai une maison avec trois etages..
2006-12-03 21:49:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lucifer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
j'ai une maison de 3 etages
2006-12-03 15:15:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by justjuju 2
·
0⤊
0⤋