English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-03 07:49:39 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Outdoor Recreation Hunting

24 answers

Hunting is a necessary part of the wildlife management in the United States today. Each year in the US the number of hunters decreases and the numbers of animals increase. Deer is a perfect example. Here in Ohio where i am a wildlife biologist there is around 600,000 white-tailed deer. Each year roughly 400,000 hunters go out and harvest around 200,000 animals. Most of which are male deer. Still every year the deer population increases. This is due to the fact that when gun season starts in Ohio most does have already been bred, and are carrying fawns.

As the populations increase the deer are expanding into the suburban and urban areas and cause many more deer vehicle accidents and become nuisances for many homeowners. This increases the number of human injuries caused by accidents and the number of dollars lost in landscaping and vehicle damages from accidents. In some areas in Ohio where hunting is outlawed deer populations have grown to dangerously high levels. This has a horrible effect on the deer. The younger, weaker deer are not able to attain the amount of food that they require in the winter, and will starve and freeze to death.

Personally i would rather see a hunter harvest animals that he can take home and feed his family with, than to see large numbers of animals that starve to death due to increased competition.

2006-12-03 08:08:17 · answer #1 · answered by beare85 2 · 5 0

We had our own land for the sole purpose of enjoying 'everything' about it. This also included hunting. (My husband and his brother hunted.)
For us, I saw to it that we used the hide, the jaws/teeth, some of the bones/skull, hooves (or toes), and definitely the meat. Very little of the animal was lost. So if you use it in this way, or at best, use 'all' the meat, because you need it, then hunting is alright. But by time you buy for everything, consider the fact that perhaps you'd have been better off going to the grocery. (I'm referring for 'any' form of hunting here.)
I am opposed to hunting that's been set up - what I refer to as fenced in hunting. Everyone gets to kill something.
We no longer hunt, as it began to go against what we were feeling inside. I hand fed the fawns and cared for the does.. as well as all the other animals on the land (Bear - coyote - deer - turtles - opossums - etc)
Never take a life - even of an animal, without a great deal of respect, and thankfulness. There was a time only the life of the male was accepted. Now it seems, people will kill either sex, for the sake of saying 'Look what I shot!'
Again, hunting is alright, if the person is in need, and does it with great respect.

2006-12-03 08:50:12 · answer #2 · answered by sassy 6 · 1 1

Even though I don't hunt myself, I've met a few hunters whom I respect a lot. Now hunting played a different role in their lives, being from different cultures, but the attitude was the same - respect the animals, hunt sustainably, form bonds with others in the great outdoors, and enjoy the food afterwards. They'd rather hunt than buy packaged meat at a supermarket, understandably since hunting is probably a more humane of killing animals than slaughterhouses.

And to respond about population control, if we humans let natural predators reign as they should, then we wouldn't need to keep on shooting a ton of deer. There is the issue of predators vs. rangers, but if we don't want game animals populating out of control, then we need something to keep them down = hunters of any species, natural predators.

2006-12-05 18:30:34 · answer #3 · answered by That Mtn Ir 1 · 0 0

Hunting is about more than just going out and killing an animal. It's about going out and enjoying the outdoors, watching a good dog work, seeing things you will never see in a town or city, getting away from the stress of everyday life, and just having fun. People who have never hunted just don't understand what it's all about. You can't really put the whole experience into words. For lack of a better word, it's kind of spiritual.

2006-12-03 14:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by esugrad97 5 · 0 1

I think that hunting is a good thing to help keep the animal population down. but I hate when people view it as a sport, or just do it to kill something, and mount it's head on the wall. I view hunting as something that shouldn't be taken lightly.

I, myself, will never take part in hunting, due to the fact that even if i was starving to death, I couldn't kill something. But to those who do hunt, for the right reasons, I have respect for...those who do it just for the thrill of killing an animal, I'm sorry to say I don't really respect much.

2006-12-03 07:55:46 · answer #5 · answered by Govinda505 3 · 2 1

nicely, it relies upon on the animal. In Canada (as an example) the position I absolutely have lived, for those with LICENSES to seek, they could hunt bears and moose. in the experience that they did not keep those populations lower than administration it would want to be risky for people. For fish, i do not ideas, so long because it isn't trawler- which it does no longer be-. as long as there are strict regulation, and also you eat WHAT YOU seize (except they're tiny or medium. purely take decrease back what you got here for- no longer any extra). people have dne that for hundreds of years. i in my view do not believe the mass killing of fish etc; through the indisputable fact that DOES dissatisfied the eco gadget. For animals like deer, they could harm the eco gadget, as they eat the grass etc; also, they could each so often be risky. even if, they wouldnt be in the experience that that they had more desirable area, so it would want to be extra efficient if we tried to keep deer in secure parts, like nationwide parks perhaps. For animals like foxes, i imagine that is incorrect. no one eats the fox- that is a valueless, cruel, unneccessary demise. nicely, the bit about won't be able to kill it, won't be able to eat it, i imagine extra- in case you may't eat it you may want to not kill it. And presented you should. do not bypass out killing deer- once you've nutrition contained in the freezer! Animals hunt one yet another. we are animals. We were born predators besides. Chimps in many situations kill deer. Why won't be able to people? Does the actual incontrovertible fact that pigs and cattle and sheep are being kept in fields and slaughtered make a distinction? In a fashion, that is crueller- no freedom. If an animal dies painfully in both situation that is incorrect- yet farmers kill animals- is that incorrect?

2016-11-23 14:48:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hunting is something that man has done since:
a) The Good Lord made us, or
b) We climbed out of the trees
............depending on your views.

It's perfectly natural and part of the balance of nature.
NOT HUNTING is un-natural and artificial.

The very recent aversion to hunting that has come up just in the past couple of decades is a symptom that a segment of our society is seriously ill. Most often the folks this afflict are female (or feminine males) urban, educated and arrogant. I have found they like a lot of cats too.

One theory I have is that the prevelance of animated cartoons like Disney fool children into thinking animals are human, that they talk, think and feel just like we do. It's a mental disorder called Anthropomorphism. Look it up.

These children never grow up and never realize that Bambi was fiction and that deer fawn are dumb creatures who sole purpose is to provide meat.

2006-12-03 11:57:47 · answer #7 · answered by DJ 7 · 2 2

Hunting is needed to keep animal herds at controlable levels. Hunting for trophys I don't agree with, even for management purposes. If you shoot it, you better eat it.Tree huggers must think the supermarket and fast food joints get their meats from animals that died of natural causes.

2006-12-03 07:56:32 · answer #8 · answered by boker_magnum 6 · 3 0

i don't deer hunt, i simply don't likre the taste of venison, but i will and do hunt varmits. hunting puts food on the table, number one, secondly. parent and children who hunt share moments only dreamed of, also, if a child is taught the proper means to hunt, safety etc, they will be much less likely to to something stupid, meaning taking daddys gun to school. etc. now the ones who know nothing about hunting and firearms, cause much more trouble than non hunters, let's be smart, teach the kids the proper way.

2006-12-03 08:49:33 · answer #9 · answered by L1M1J1 4 · 4 0

I love hunting,and I'll never give it up.I get meat for the freezer,a nice piece of leather,and some antlers to make things with.It's also nice to enjoy the outdoors with your family and friends.

2006-12-03 16:18:28 · answer #10 · answered by Vtmtnman 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers