English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i don't see any difference any in them, do you?

2006-12-03 05:13:39 · 21 answers · asked by poolitics 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

Hitler had a funny mustache.

2006-12-03 05:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by ....... 4 · 2 2

I do:

President George W. Bush is the president of the United States, a democracy. Everybody makes mistakes: Its just that his were on live television.

Prime Minister Tony Blair is the Prime Minister of England, mostly a democracy. England is the ally of the United States, and is also one of the more powerful nations in the UN.

Adolf Hitler was a anti-semitic tyrant who conquered Germany through manipulating the government, and then started World War II by conquering all of Europe and putting forth his plan to destroy all the "inferiors". He committed suicide and was responsible for the deaths of millions.


Tony Blair and George Bush are only human. They make mistakes. You've probably made bigger mistakes. The only difference is that their mistakes were made public knowledge by the media.

However, only an idiot would criticize them for their mistakes(especially if they can't do better) and compare them to one of the most evil and powerful tyrants in the history of Europe.

I guess you qualify as an idiot, then.


EDIT

Gento, WTF? They're not gay. George Bush opposes homosexuality. You qualify as an idiot, too.

George Bush and Tony Blair are christians, and Hitler was a Roman Catholic (a christian).

You guys really don't know anything, do you?

2006-12-03 05:20:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

There is no accounting for taste. And most of the people that voted for any of the above were probably not privy to any of the nasty hidden secrets the men in question have. That is why they are secret, because those men went to great lengths to keep the mudslinging away from information like that would be my guess. There are differences of course but similarities as well.

2006-12-03 05:20:18 · answer #3 · answered by mortgagegirl101 6 · 0 0

How in the world you can put Hitler in the same category as Bush and Blair is beyond me.
Hitler killed over 6 million Jews and was responsible for several millions more in WWII.

Besides, Hitler was a satanist if you would research it.

I would do my research before making such ridiculous accusations.

2006-12-03 05:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by phoenix 3 · 3 1

You don't see a difference because you are blind. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair are of a higher calibre than Hitler was. Hitler could have been a better person, but he chose evil over good. Anyone who wants to put President Bush and PM Blair on the same level as Hitler, is totally and completely out of touch with reality.

2006-12-03 05:19:47 · answer #5 · answered by theprez7 3 · 3 3

Julia is that you in disguise? The $ instead of s is highly suspicious!!
And yes there is a lot of difference!!

Phoenix is right Hitler was a Satanist. He joined the Thule Society in 1919 which practiced Satanism and Black magic. That's where a lot of his ideas about Ayrians being the superior race came from.

http://threeworldwars.com/world-war-2/adolf-hitler.htm

2006-12-03 05:17:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Neither Bush or Blair massacred six million Jews in Nazi death camps. Hitler would have died of syphilis had he not committed suicide. Hardly a gentleman, and definitely not in Bush or Blair's league.

2006-12-03 05:21:01 · answer #7 · answered by Paulie D 5 · 3 1

they are all Freemason bringing in the new world order,the religions in control are a tool of manipulation use to keep people narrow minded and at each others throat .they do this to generate fear among the people thus the people ask them for a solution and they use that opportunity to get a tighter grip on power and there further their agenda which one global government run by a few rich and powerful family's

2006-12-03 05:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by gasp 4 · 2 2

They aren't! Fine gentlemen are above 'organised relegion' which at best is a form of brain washing whatever the denomination.

2006-12-03 05:26:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The question is, why is it that members of a league of fine gentlemen become Christian leaders?

2006-12-03 05:15:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers