English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

It depends on the situation...

I run, I think

2006-12-03 03:07:44 · answer #1 · answered by Luiz S 7 · 0 0

Depending on the situation, if I had nowhere to run or hide I`d stand and fight. To the best of my ability, providing the adversary was not armed. In that case one would have to give in and hope for the best.

If both parties were armed, I would most definitley fight back.

2006-12-03 11:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by v1y 1 · 0 0

Hide because if you run and use up your energy in a short time, your going to be in troble!

2006-12-03 11:09:05 · answer #3 · answered by HELP PLEASE 1 · 0 0

I would run then hide so it gives me time to get prepared for what happens.

2006-12-03 11:16:47 · answer #4 · answered by gaddiel a 1 · 0 0

i'll hide. can't run my legs are too short for running fast besides it's better rather to tire yourself. once you get caught, you still have enough energy to fight back right?

2006-12-03 11:08:39 · answer #5 · answered by warrior is a child 6 · 0 0

i would choose some combination of both. i would also try to find a cell phone, a book of matches and a staple gun...macgyver taught me everything i know

and les stroud

2006-12-03 11:07:45 · answer #6 · answered by littlehey5 3 · 0 0

i would not hide and i would only run for as long as it took me to find a decent weapon

2006-12-03 11:07:36 · answer #7 · answered by Bazil 3 · 0 0

I would run. I would probably be faster.

2006-12-03 11:07:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

run

2006-12-03 11:06:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fight

2006-12-03 11:07:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers